Literature DB >> 19760332

Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve.

Yap Yan Lin1, Asim Shabbir, Jimmy B Y So.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is being performed increasingly, worldwide. To the resident, it provides a valuable opportunity to master basic laparoscopic skills. Studies have shown that laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents is safe. However, to date, there is no clear evidence for the minimum number of these operations required to achieving proficiency and safety. The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of laparoscopic appendectomies performed by surgical residents and to evaluate the effect of learning curve on patient outcome.
METHODS: All patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomies performed by six residents during the study period were reviewed. Data on patient demographics,clinical and histological diagnosis, and outcome variables including operative duration, conversion to open surgery, complications, and length of stay were analyzed. We evaluated the effect of the learning curve by dividing patients into two groups: a first group consisting of the initial 20 patients and a second group consisting of the next 20 patients operated upon independently by each resident. Variables were analyzed to determine any difference between the two groups.
RESULTS: Three hundred six patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis underwent laparoscopic appendectomy by residents. Mean operative time was 83.8 min. Of patients, 14.6% required conversion to open surgery. Mean length of hospitalization was 2.82 days. Operative duration and complication rate were significantly reduced with increasing experience of residents. The length of hospital stay and conversion rate to open surgery remained unchanged.
CONCLUSION: Operative duration and complications can be reduced with increasing experience of a resident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19760332     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0691-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Factors associated with conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Shiuh-Inn Liu; Bettina Siewert; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Richard A Hodin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  An optimal, cost-effective laparoscopic appendectomy technique for our surgical residents.

Authors:  Wai-Tat Ng; Yiu-Kee Lee; Sheung-Kit Hui; Yeung-Sing Sze; John Chan; Ada Guo-Ying Zeng; Chong-Hing Wong; Wai-Ho Wong
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  The impact of a resident's seniority on operative time and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes used to measure the resident's laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  M Shabtai; D Rosin; O Zmora; Y Munz; A Scarlat; E L Shabtai; B Bar Zakai; M Natour; M Ben-Haim; A Ayalon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review.

Authors:  M Kapischke; A Caliebe; J Tepel; T Schulz; J Hedderich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Jimmy B Y So; Ee-Cherk Chiong; Edmond Chiong; Wei-Keat Cheah; David Lomanto; Peter Goh; Cheng-Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Role of appendectomy in laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Chong-Chi Chiu; Po-Li Wei; Weu Wang; Robert J Chen; Tai-Chi Chen; Wei-Jei Lee; Ming-Te Huang
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses.

Authors:  K H Long; M P Bannon; S P Zietlow; E R Helgeson; W S Harmsen; C D Smith; D M Ilstrup; Y Baerga-Varela; M G Sarr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.

Authors:  Naveen Pokala; S Sadhasivam; R P Kiran; V Parithivel
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  [Laparoscopic or classical appendectomy? A prospective randomized study].

Authors:  D Hebebrand; H Troidl; W Spangenberger; E Neugebauer; T Schwalm; M W Günther
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Unsupervised laparoscopic appendicectomy by surgical trainees is safe and time-effective.

Authors:  Kenneth Wong; Tristram Duncan; Andrew Pearson
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.767

View more
  28 in total

1.  Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Alessandra Buja; Tatjana Baldovin; Giampietro Callegaro; Paolo Sandonà; Domenico Mantoan; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Conventional Laparoscopic Appendicectomy and Laparoscope-Assisted Appendicectomy: a Comparative Study.

Authors:  Mayank Baid; Manoranjan Kar; Utpal De; Mrityunjay Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Trends in the Use of Laparoscopic Versus Open Paediatric Appendicectomy: A Regional 12-Year Study and a National Survey.

Authors:  N R Bhatt; E Dunne; M Faraz; A E Gillis; K C Conlon; S Paran; P F Ridgway
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy as an index procedure for surgical trainees: clinical outcomes and learning curve.

Authors:  Alessandro Ussia; Samuele Vaccari; Gaetano Gallo; Ugo Grossi; Riccardo Ussia; Lodovico Sartarelli; Margherita Minghetti; Augusto Lauro; Paolo Barbieri; S Di Saverio; Maurizio Cervellera; Valeria Tonini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-04

5.  Minimally invasive surgery adoption into an established surgical practice: impact of a fellowship-trained colleague.

Authors:  Edward P Dominguez; Cory Barrat; Lynn Shaffer; Ryan Gruner; Donald Whisler; Philip Taylor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Accelerated learning curve for colorectal resection, open versus laparoscopic approach, can be attained with expert supervision.

Authors:  T Maeda; K Y Tan; Fumio Konishi; S Tsujinaka; K Mizokami; J Sasaki; Y J Kawamura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Severe Complications of Laparoscopic and Conventional Appendectomy Reported to the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre.

Authors:  Sannamari Kotaluoto; Satu-Liisa K Pauniaho; Mika T Helminen; Juhani A Sand; Tuomo K Rantanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a multilevel approach with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Laura Haas; Tom Stargardt; Jonas Schreyoegg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-10-08

9.  Impact of tutorial assistance in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for acute recurrent diverticulitis.

Authors:  Henry Hoffmann; Salome Dell-Kuster; Jörg Genstorfer; Oleg Heizmann; Christoph Kettelhack; Igor Langer; Daniel Oertli; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  A systematic review of techniques and interventions for improving adherence to inclusion and exclusion criteria during enrolment into randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Fiona Simpson; Elizabeth A Sweetman; Gordon S Doig
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.