Literature DB >> 17180288

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity, and delayed complications with 500 cases.

Edward H Chin1, David Hazzan, Daniel M Herron, John N Gaetano, Scott A Ames, Jonathan S Bromberg, Michael Edye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several large series of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) have been published, largely focusing on immediate results and short-term complications. The aim of this study was to examine the results of LDN and collect medium-term and long-term donor followup.
METHODS: We examined the results of two surgeons who performed 500 consecutive LDNs from 1996 to 2005. Prospective databases were reviewed for both donors and recipients to record demographics, medical history, intraoperative events, and complications. Patients were followed between 1 month and 9 years after surgery to assess for delayed complications, especially hypertension, renal insufficiency, incisional hernia, bowel obstruction, and chronic pain.
RESULTS: Left kidneys were procured in 86.2% of cases. Mean operative time was 3.5 h, and warm ischemia time averaged 3.4 min. Hand-assistance was used in 13.8%, and conversion rate was 1.8%. Intraoperative complication rate was 5.8% and was predominantly bleeding (93.1%). Most (86.2%) of the operative complications occurred during the initial 150 cases of a surgeon, compared with 10.3% in the subsequent 150 cases (p = 0.003). Operative time decreased by 87 min after the initial 150 cases (p < 0.001). Immediate graft survival was 97.5%. Delayed graft function occurred in 3.0% of recipients, and acute tubular necrosis occurred in 7.0%. Thirty-day donor complication rate was 9.8%. Mean donor creatinine was 1.24 on the first postoperative day, 1.27 at 2 weeks, and 1.24 at 1 year. At a mean followup of 32.8 months, long-term donor complications consisted of 11 cases of hypertension, 9 cases of prolonged pain or paresthesia, 2 incisional hernias, 1 small bowel obstruction requiring laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, and 1 hydrocele requiring repair.
CONCLUSIONS: LDN can be performed with acceptable immediate morbidity and excellent graft function. Operative time and complications decreased significantly after a surgeon performed 150 cases. Long-term complications were uncommon but included a likely underestimated incidence of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17180288     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9021-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  16 in total

1.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience.

Authors:  S C Jacobs; E Cho; B J Dunkin; J L Flowers; E Schweitzer; C Cangro; J Fink; A Farney; B Philosophe; B Jarrell; S T Bartlett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Li-Ming Su; Lloyd E Ratner; Robert A Montgomery; Thomas W Jarrett; Bruce J Trock; Vladimir Sinkov; Rachel Bluebond-Langner; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation.

Authors:  Amy L Friedman; Thomas G Peters; Kenneth W Jones; L Ebony Boulware; Lloyd E Ratner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Clinical outcome of living kidney donation.

Authors:  M Ciszek; L Paczek; W Rowiński
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Effect of intravascular volume expansion on renal function during prolonged CO2 pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  E T London; H S Ho; A M Neuhaus; B M Wolfe; S M Rudich; R V Perez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Authors:  P Lindström; M Häggman; J Wadström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  B Philosophe; P C Kuo; E J Schweitzer; A C Farney; J W Lim; L B Johnson; S Jacobs; J L Flowers; E S Cho; S T Bartlett
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution.

Authors:  Joseph R Leventhal; Burak Kocak; Paolo R O Salvalaggio; Alan J Koffron; Talia B Baker; Dixon B Kaufman; Jonathan P Fryer; Michael M Abecassis; Frank P Stuart
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted approaches to live-donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Ergun Velidedeoglu; Noel Williams; Kenneth L Brayman; Niraj M Desai; Luis Campos; Maral Palanjian; Martin Wocjik; Roy Bloom; Robert A Grossman; Kevin Mange; Clyde F Barker; Ali Naji; James F Markmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  L E Ratner; L J Ciseck; R G Moore; F G Cigarroa; H S Kaufman; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  10 in total

1.  [Is the traditional open donor nephrectomy in living donor renal transplantation still up to date?].

Authors:  Karolin Thiel; Christian Thiel; Martin Schenk; Ruth Ladurner; Silvio Nadalin; Nils Heyne; Alfred Königsrainer; Wolfgang Steurer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy: current state of the art.

Authors:  Nicole M Shockcor; Sam Sultan; Josue Alvarez-Casas; Philip S Brazio; Michael Phelan; John C LaMattina; Rolf N Barth
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Right versus left retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Toshiaki Kashiwadate; Kazuaki Tokodai; Noritoshi Amada; Izumi Haga; Tetsuro Takayama; Atsushi Nakamura; Takuya Jimbo; Yasuyuki Hara; Naoki Kawagishi; Noriaki Ohuchi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Effect of Orogastric Acetazolamide on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomies: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

Authors:  Indu M Sen; Nitika Goel; Ashish Aditya; Ishwar Bhukkal; Ashish Sharma
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Transition from laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic approach for live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Zi Qin Ng; Gabrielle Musk; Alethea Rea; Bulang He
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Donor complications following laparoscopic compared to hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: an analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Whitney R Halgrimson; Jeffrey Campsen; M Susan Mandell; Mara A Kelly; Igal Kam; Michael A Zimmerman
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2010-01-06

7.  An acetazolamide based multimodal analgesic approach versus conventional pain management in patients undergoing laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Rupinder Singh; Indu Sen; Jyotsna Wig; M Minz; Ashish Sharma; Indu Bala
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08

8.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Are ten cases per year enough to reach the quality standards? A report from a single small-volume transplant center.

Authors:  S Saad; A Paul; J Treckmann; A Tarabichi; M Nagelschmidt; W Arns
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The Learning Curve of Pure Retroperitoneoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

Authors:  B C Pal; P R Modi; S J Rizvi; R Chauhan; S Kumar; R Nagarajan; D Kaushal; V B Kute; H L Trivedi
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2017-11-01

10.  Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in Complete Situs Inversus.

Authors:  John V Gahagan; Matthew D Whealon; Uttam Reddy; Clarence E Foster; Hirohito Ichii
Journal:  J Endourol Case Rep       Date:  2016-05-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.