Literature DB >> 19633883

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Are ten cases per year enough to reach the quality standards? A report from a single small-volume transplant center.

S Saad1, A Paul, J Treckmann, A Tarabichi, M Nagelschmidt, W Arns.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is the preferred method of kidney donation in high-volume US transplant centers, but for small transplant programs the question of the minimal case load per year necessary to reach the quality standards is open. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1996 to 2007 we performed 130 live kidney donations including 93 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies followed by transplantation in a community hospital with an average case load of 10 laparoscopic cases per year. We compared the results after 37 open and 93 laparoscopic live donor operations with respect to operating time, conversion rate, complications, and recipients' outcome.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in terms of safe outcome of donor patients after open or laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The mean operating time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in the open group (125 min, OG) than in the laparoscopic group (150 min, LG). Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in LG (6.8 days) versus OG (9.7 days). The conversion rate was 3.2% in the LG. Postoperative complication of donors consisted of temporary nerve irritation (two patients) and retroperitoneal hematoma (one patient) in the LG, and wound infection followed by hernia formation (one patient) and ileus 1 year after organ donation (one patient) in the OG. Safe outcome of the recipients after open (RaOD) or laparoscopic donation (RaLD) was similar. Uneventful transplantation occurred in 94.6% of the RaOD and in 92.5% of the RaLD. One kidney was lost due to renal vein thrombosis (RaLD). Mean postoperative creatinine after 4 weeks showed no difference between RaOD (1.6 mg/dl) and RaLD (1.7 mg/dl).
CONCLUSION: Approximately ten cases per year may be enough to ensure safety and quality of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19633883     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0642-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Li-Ming Su; Lloyd E Ratner; Robert A Montgomery; Thomas W Jarrett; Bruce J Trock; Vladimir Sinkov; Rachel Bluebond-Langner; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Hand-assisted versus total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  I-Rue Lai; Meng-Kun Tsai; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Proposed live donor nephrectomy complication classification scheme.

Authors:  Henkie P Tan; Ron Shapiro; Robert A Montgomery; Lloyd E Ratner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: short learning curve.

Authors:  R Dalla Valle; M P Mazzoni; E Capocasale; N Busi; A Pietrabissa; C Moretto; M Gualtierotti; M Massa; F Mosca; M Sianesi
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy increases the supply of living donor kidneys: a center-specific microeconomic analysis.

Authors:  P C Kuo; L B Johnson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  [Laparoscopic liver donor nephrectomy. Personal experiences and review of the literature].

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; M Wiesel; S Carl; I Drehmer; W Jurgowski; G Staehler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  G R R Lewis; N R Brook; J R Waller; J C Bains; P S Veitch; M L Nicholson
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Niels F M Kok; May Y Lind; Birgitta M E Hansson; Desiree Pilzecker; Ingrid R A M Mertens zur Borg; Ben C Knipscheer; Eric J Hazebroek; Ine M Dooper; Willem Weimar; Wim C J Hop; Eddy M M Adang; Gert Jan van der Wilt; Hendrik J Bonjer; Jordanus A van der Vliet; Jan N M IJzermans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-17

9.  [Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results].

Authors:  M Giessing; S Deger; V Ebeling; J Roigas; I Türk; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity, and delayed complications with 500 cases.

Authors:  Edward H Chin; David Hazzan; Daniel M Herron; John N Gaetano; Scott A Ames; Jonathan S Bromberg; Michael Edye
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  2 in total

1.  The volume-outcome relationship in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; King-Teh Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Hao-Hsien Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of the Learning Curve of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bum Sik Tae; Ulanbek Balpukov; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Chang Wook Jeong
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.