Literature DB >> 11928020

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy.

P Lindström1, M Häggman, J Wadström.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopy (HALS) was introduced to increase the safety of living donor nephrectomies. Herein we evaluate the first HALS living donor nephrectomies performed at our center.
METHODS: Traditional laparoscopic nephrectomies (TLS) (n = 11) and HALS nephrectomies (n = 11) were included in the study. One patient from the TLS group was excluded because the operation was converted to open nephrectomy. We compared the operating times (OT) and warm ischemia times (WIT) for the two procedures and calculated the operating costs.
RESULTS: Mean OT was 270 min in the TLS group and 197 min in the HALS group; thus, there was, a significant reduction of 27% with HALS. WIT was 297 sec for the TLS group and 214 sec for the HALS group, for a reduction of 28%. Costs were also lowered for HALS.
CONCLUSION: In addition to shortening both OT and WIT, HALS enhances the safety margin of the procedure, especially during trocar placement. It is further helpful in preventing torsion of the kidney and controlling potential bleedings, as well as during vascular stapling and kidney removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11928020     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9120-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Current concepts in transplant surgery: laparoscopic living donor of the kidney.

Authors:  Andreas Paul; Jürgen Treckmann; Anja Gallinat; Oliver Witzke; Udo Vester; Christoph E Broelsch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Clinical research and social status investigation for donor and recipient of living-related kidney transplant.

Authors:  Wujun Xue; Puxun Tian; Xiaoming Ding; Xiaoming Pan; Hang Yan; Jun Hou; Xinshun Feng; Heli Xiang; Xiaohui Tian; Li Ren; Jin Zheng; Shengbin Li
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  [Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results].

Authors:  M Giessing; S Deger; V Ebeling; J Roigas; I Türk; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns.

Authors:  K W Kercher; B T Heniford; B D Matthews; T I Smith; A E Lincourt; D H Hayes; L B Eskind; P B Irby; C M Teigland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity, and delayed complications with 500 cases.

Authors:  Edward H Chin; David Hazzan; Daniel M Herron; John N Gaetano; Scott A Ames; Jonathan S Bromberg; Michael Edye
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Living donor of the kidney-open-video.

Authors:  Jens G Brockmann; Norbert Senninger; Heiner H Wolters
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Hand-assisted and total laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison.

Authors:  Jonathan Silberstein; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Hand-Assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy PERiumbilical versus Pfannenstiel incision and return to normal physical ACTivity (HAPERPACT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yakup Kulu; Beat P Müller-Stich; Omid Ghamarnejad; Elias Khajeh; Georgios Polychronidis; Mohammad Golriz; Felix Nickel; Laura Benner; Philipp Knebel; Markus Diener; Christian Morath; Martin Zeier; Markus W Büchler; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.