Literature DB >> 17170931

Hearing preservation by the extended and nonextended middle cranial fossa approach for acoustic neuroma.

J Kanzaki, T O-Uchi, K Ogawa, R Shiobara, S Toya.   

Abstract

The results of 248 cases of acoustic neuroma surgery carried out mainly by the extended middle cranial fossa approach during a 16-year period from 1976 to 1991 are analyzed. Hearing preservation was attempted in 69 cases and successfully achieved in 35 (51%) cases. Hearing was preserved in 24 (57%) of 42 cases in which a tumor was 20 mm or smaller in diameter, pure-tone hearing level was 50 dB or lower, and speech discrimination score was 50% or higher. The hearing preservation rate (76%) in the cases with a tumor extending 3 mm or less from the internal auditory canal was much higher than in cases with a larger tumor. Hearing was preserved in three of seven cases with a tumor of 21 mm or larger and in two of four cases of neurofibromatosis type 2. The evaluation of postoperative hearing is also discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 17170931      PMCID: PMC1656486          DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1058974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base Surg        ISSN: 1052-1453


  15 in total

1.  Surgical exposure of the internal auditory canal and its contents through the middle, cranial fossa.

Authors:  W F HOUSE
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  The efficacy of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in acoustic tumor surgery.

Authors:  J F Kveton
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  Classification of the extended middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  J Kanzaki; R Shiobara; S Toya
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1991

4.  Hearing conservation in acoustic neuroma surgery via the posterior fossa.

Authors:  D L Baldwin; T T King; A W Morrison
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Retrosigmoid removal of acoustic neuroma: experience 1978-1988.

Authors:  S G Harner; C W Beatty; M J Ebersold
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Acoustic tumor surgery. Prognostic factors in hearing conversation.

Authors:  C Shelton; D E Brackmann; W F House; W E Hitselberger
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-10

7.  Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery with intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring: Part II. A classification of results.

Authors:  H Silverstein; A McDaniel; H Norrell; T Haberkamp
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Hearing preservation following suboccipital removal of acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  J L Kemink; M J LaRouere; P R Kileny; S A Telian; J T Hoff
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Acoustic neuroma surgery: the results of hearing conservation surgery.

Authors:  M E Glasscock; K X McKennan; S C Levine
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Preservation of hearing in acoustic tumor surgery: audiologic indicators.

Authors:  A F Josey; M E Glasscock; C G Jackson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hearing preservation surgery in acoustic neuroma patients with normal hearing.

Authors:  J Kanzaki; K Ogawa; Y Inoue; R Shiobara
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1997

2.  Auditory Brain Stem Response Predictors of Hearing Outcomes after Middle Fossa Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Yin Ren; Catherine M Merna; Kareem O Tawfik; Marc S Schwartz; Rick A Friedman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.