Literature DB >> 1843587

Classification of the extended middle cranial fossa approach.

J Kanzaki1, R Shiobara, S Toya.   

Abstract

There are several possible operative approaches to acoustic neuroma surgery. Ideally, there should be no need to select among approaches according to tumor size or indications for hearing preservation. The ideal approach should also allow otologists and neurosurgeons to work as a team using the same operative field and achieve functional preservation (facial nerve function and hearing) in a high percentage of cases. In 1977, the authors first reported on the extended middle cranial fossa (EMCF) approach for AN surgery. Based on our 15-year experiences of this approach, we have classified it into 3 types and describe their indications and techniques in the present paper. In addition, we examine the advantages and disadvantages and emphasize its excellent applicability as a team approach for otologists and neurosurgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1843587     DOI: 10.3109/00016489109130439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0365-5237


  4 in total

1.  Hearing preservation by the extended and nonextended middle cranial fossa approach for acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  J Kanzaki; T O-Uchi; K Ogawa; R Shiobara; S Toya
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1994

2.  Hearing preservation surgery in acoustic neuroma patients with normal hearing.

Authors:  J Kanzaki; K Ogawa; Y Inoue; R Shiobara
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1997

3.  Use of the ultrasonically activated scalpel in acoustic neuroma surgery: preliminary report.

Authors:  J Kanzaki; Y Inoue; K Kurashima; R Shiobara
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  2000

4.  Does hearing preservation surgery for acoustic neuromas affect tinnitus?

Authors:  J Kanzaki; A Satoh; T Kunihiro
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1999
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.