Literature DB >> 3108775

Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery with intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring: Part II. A classification of results.

H Silverstein, A McDaniel, H Norrell, T Haberkamp.   

Abstract

Since the advent of brainstem auditory evoked response audiometry and computerized tomography, small acoustic neuromas are more frequently found. Often the patient has serviceable hearing, which we would like to preserve during complete tumor removal. Since 1978, sixteen patients with acoustic neuromas have been operated upon through the retrosigmoid suboccipital approach, with the goal of hearing preservation. In 1983, we began using intraoperative direct eighth nerve monitoring, which produced a rapid assessment of cochlear nerve function during the excision of small acoustic neuromas. The tumors varied in size from intracanalicular lesions to one lesion with a 3.0 cm protrusion medial to the porus acousticus. In eight of sixteen cases, intraoperative monitoring was used, and in four of the patients hearing was preserved. In eight cases, intraoperative monitoring was not used, and hearing was preserved in only two patients. The overall success rate--in total tumor removal with hearing preservation--was 37%. Hearing was preserved in six of eight patients who had tumors which measured less than 1.5 cm. In this group of cases, two of the patients had a Class I good hearing result (PTA 0 to 30 dB and 70 to 100% discrimination), one patient had Class III nonserviceable hearing, (PTA 65 to 75 dB and 25 to 45% discrimination), and three patients had Class IV poor hearing, (PTA 80 to 100 dB and 0 to 20% discrimination). We found that continuous monitoring of direct eighth-nerve-evoked action potentials were extremely valuable and rapidly indicated reversible cochlear nerve trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3108775     DOI: 10.1177/01945998860953P104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  9 in total

1.  Intraoperative monitoring by transtympanic electrocochleography and brainstem electrical response audiometry in acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  T Lenarz; A Ernst
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Hearing preservation by the extended and nonextended middle cranial fossa approach for acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  J Kanzaki; T O-Uchi; K Ogawa; R Shiobara; S Toya
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1994

3.  Advantages of a new, atraumatic, self-retaining electrode for direct cochlear nerve monitoring.

Authors:  M J Ruckenstein; R A Cueva; G R Prioleau
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1997

4.  Hearing Outcomes Reporting in Lateral Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Casazza; Christian A Bowers; Richard K Gurgel
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-12-05

5.  Influence of blood supply, thermal and mechanical traumata on hearing function in an animal model.

Authors:  V Braun; H P Richter
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 6.  Management of acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  A Wright; R Bradford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-28

Review 7.  [Value of different strategies in the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: therapeutic aspects and literature analysis].

Authors:  W Maier; T D Grauvogel; R Laszig; G J Ridder
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Systematic Review of Hearing Preservation After Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  Adam R Coughlin; Tyler J Willman; Samuel P Gubbels
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  [Hearing classification in patients with vestibular schwannoma using German-language test procedures].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke; D Vordermark; C Strauss; C Scheller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.284

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.