Literature DB >> 19218521

Behavioral responses of big brown bats to dives by praying mantises.

Kaushik Ghose1, Jeffrey D Triblehorn, Kari Bohn, David D Yager, Cynthia F Moss.   

Abstract

Insectivorous echolocating bats face a formidable array of defenses employed by their airborne prey. One such insect defense is the ultrasound-triggered dive, which is a sudden, rapid drop in altitude, sometimes all the way to the ground. Although many previous studies have investigated the dynamics of such dives and their effect on insect survival rate, there has been little work on how bats may adapt to such an insect defense employed in the middle of pursuit. In this study we investigated how big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) adjust their pursuit strategy when flying praying mantises (Parasphendale agrionina) execute evasive, ultrasound-triggered dives. Although the mantis dive occasionally forced the bat to completely abort its chase (25% trials), in a number of cases (75% trials) the bat followed the mantis into the dive. In such cases the bat kept its sonar beam locked onto the target and maneuvered to maintain the same time efficient strategy it adopted during level flight pursuit, though it was ultimately defeated by the dive. This study suggests that although the mantis dive can be effective in evading the bat, it does not always deter the bat from continuing pursuit and, given enough altitude, the bat can potentially capture diving prey using the same flight strategy it employs to intercept prey in level flight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19218521      PMCID: PMC2726853          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.019380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  18 in total

1.  Steering by hearing: a bat's acoustic gaze is linked to its flight motor output by a delayed, adaptive linear law.

Authors:  Kaushik Ghose; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The sonar beam pattern of a flying bat as it tracks tethered insects.

Authors:  Kaushik Ghose; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Echolocation and passive listening by foraging mouse-eared bats Myotis myotis and M. blythii.

Authors:  Danilo Russo; Gareth Jones; Raphaël Arlettaz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  C F Moss; A Surlykke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Structure, development, and evolution of insect auditory systems.

Authors:  D D Yager
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Timing of praying mantis evasive responses during simulated bat attack sequences.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Triblehorn; David D Yager
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Visual guidance of intercepting a moving target on foot.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; William H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Arctiid moth clicks can degrade the accuracy of range difference discrimination in echolocating big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  L A Miller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Active listening for spatial orientation in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Kari Bohn; Hannah Gilkenson; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Spectral sensitivity studies on the visual system of the praying mantis, Tenodera sinensis.

Authors:  C Sontag
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  10 in total

1.  Adaptive behavior for texture discrimination by the free-flying big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Ben Falk; Tameeka Williams; Murat Aytekin; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  When hawks attack: animal-borne video studies of goshawk pursuit and prey-evasion strategies.

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Andrew H Fulton; Lee J Rosenthal
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Responsive robotic prey reveal how predators adapt to predictability in escape tactics.

Authors:  Andrew W Szopa-Comley; Christos C Ioannou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Waiting is the Hardest Part: Comparison of Two Computational Strategies for Performing a Compelled-Response Task.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Swetha Shankar; M Gabriela Costello; Dantong Zhu; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 5.  Decoupling speed and accuracy in an urgent decision-making task reveals multiple contributions to their trade-off.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Veronica E Scerra; Christopher K Hauser; M Gabriela Costello; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Timing matters: sonar call groups facilitate target localization in bats.

Authors:  Ninad B Kothari; Melville J Wohlgemuth; Katrine Hulgard; Annemarie Surlykke; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Coordinated Control of Acoustical Field of View and Flight in Three-Dimensional Space for Consecutive Capture by Echolocating Bats during Natural Foraging.

Authors:  Miwa Sumiya; Emyo Fujioka; Kazuya Motoi; Masaru Kondo; Shizuko Hiryu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Early erratic flight response of the lucerne moth to the quiet echolocation calls of distant bats.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Andrew C Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Flexible echolocation behavior of trawling bats during approach of continuous or transient prey cues.

Authors:  Kirstin Ubernickel; Marco Tschapka; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Acoustic Aposematism and Evasive Action in Select Chemically Defended Arctiine (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) Species: Nonchalant or Not?

Authors:  Nicolas J Dowdy; William E Conner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.