Literature DB >> 30817280

Robotic radical prostatectomy in 93 cases: Outcomes of the first ERUS robotic urology curriculum trained surgeon in Turkey.

Fevzi Bedir1, Murat Keske2, Şaban Oğuz Demirdöğen1, Hüseyin Kocatürk1, Erdem Koç3, Abdullah Erdem Canda4, Ali Fuat Atmaca3,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study presents the surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of the first 93 robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedures performed in Erzurum, Turkey. These procedures were performed by a single surgeon who had completed the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) RARP curriculum in an ERUS-certified training center in Ankara.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study present the results of 93 RARP procedures performed by a single surgeon. The surgeon performing the operations completed an ERUS training program structured for RARP by two robotic surgeons holding ERUS training certificates in an ERUS-approved academic robotic surgery training center in Ankara. The RARP cases performed by the surgeon after completion of the training between April 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 63.62±7.04 years, and the mean preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level was 8.34±4.96 ng/mL. Preoperatively, 82 and 4 patients had prostate biopsy Gleason scores of 3+3 and 4+3, respectively. Bilateral neurovascular bundle (NVB) sparing, unilateral NVB-sparing, and non-NVB-sparing surgery were performed in 21, 13, and 59 cases, respectively. The mean prostate weight was 85.34±47.57 g. Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction was performed in 60 (64.5%) cases. Mean console time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, and urethral catheter removal time were 170.49±36.50 min, 100.70±34.08 cc, 6.84±2.28 days, and 7.40±3.11 days, respectively. During the perioperative period (0-30 days), five minor (prolonged drain output, n=3; rectocele, n=1; gout arthritis, n=1) and six major (inguinal hernia, n=1; incisional hernia, n=2; anastomotic urinary leakage, n=2; myocardial infarction, n=1) complications were identified. No complication was detected during postoperative days 31-90. Postoperative pathological stages included pT2a, pT2b, and pT2c disease in 77 (82.8%), 9 (9.7%), and 7 (7.5%) patients, respectively. The positive surgical margin (SM) rate was 10.7% (n=10), including patients with pT2a (n=6) and pT2c (n=2) diseases. Eleven (11.8%) patients underwent pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection. The mean LN yield was 16.45±4.29. The mean length of follow-up was 11.17±8.01 months. Biochemical recurrence was observed in two patients, one of whom received maximal androgen blockage (MAB), and the other one received pelvic radiotherapy+MAB. All the patients with at least one-year follow-up (n=48, 51.6%) were fully continent (0 pads/day). Of the 40 (43%) patients with no preoperative erectile dysfunction (ED) and with at least three-month follow-up, 18 (45%) had no ED, with or without any additional medication including phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors.
CONCLUSION: RARP is a safe minimally invasive procedure with acceptable morbidity, excellent operative, pathological and oncological outcomes, and satisfactory functional results. The ERUS RARP curriculum provides effective and sufficient training.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30817280      PMCID: PMC6469731          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.24444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  25 in total

1.  Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Binder; W Kramer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted.

Authors:  Rodrigo Frota; Burak Turna; Rodrigo Barros; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Marcelo Orvieto; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kenneth J Palmer; Darien Kameh; Luigi Santoro; Geoff D Coughlin; Michael Liss; Wooju Jeong; John Malcolm; Joshua M Stern; Saurabh Sharma; Kevin C Zorn; Sergey Shikanov; Arieh L Shalhav; Gregory P Zagaja; Thomas E Ahlering; Koon H Rha; David M Albala; Michael D Fabrizio; David I Lee; Sanket Chauhan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  History of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Satyam Kalan; Sanket Chauhan; Rafael F Coelho; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ignacio R Camacho; Kenneth J Palmer; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-07-22

5.  Learning curve and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 200 initial Japanese cases by a single surgeon.

Authors:  Takeshi Hashimoto; Kunihiko Yoshioka; Tatsuo Gondo; Naohiro Kamoda; Naoya Satake; Choichiro Ozu; Yutaka Horiguchi; Kazunori Namiki; Jun Nakashima; Masaaki Tachibana
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up.

Authors:  Albert A Mikhail; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ehab S Billatos; Kevin C Zorn; Edward M Gong; Charles B Brendler; Gregory P Zagaja; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution.

Authors:  A Tewari; A Srivasatava; M Menon
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients.

Authors:  A I Tasci; I Tufek; E Gumus; A E Canda; V Tugcu; F Atug; U Boylu; Z Akbulut; S Sahin; A Simsek; A R Kural
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study.

Authors:  Simonetta Fracalanza; Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Antonio Galfano; Giacomo Novara; Angelo Mangano; Mario Plebani; Walter Artibani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The safety of urologic robotic surgery depends on the skills of the surgeon.

Authors:  Erika Palagonia; Elio Mazzone; Geert De Naeyer; Frederiek D'Hondt; Justin Collins; Pawel Wisz; Fijs W B Van Leeuwen; Henk Van Der Poel; Peter Schatteman; Alexandre Mottrie; Paolo Dell'Oglio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Outcomes report of the first ERUS robotic urology curriculum-trained surgeon in Turkey: the importance of structured and validated training programs for global outcomes improvement.

Authors:  Elio Mazzone; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-05-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.