Literature DB >> 17160983

Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women.

Bernhard Fink1, Nick Neave, Hanna Seydel.   

Abstract

Previous studies showed that male faces with extreme features that are likely to be associated with testosterone (T) are perceived as dominant and masculine. Women were reported to prefer masculinized male faces, as they may consider T markers to be an "honest" indication of good health. However, it is also likely that female preferences for certain male faces arise from the fact that dominant- and masculine-looking males are signaling characteristics which may be beneficial in intrasexual conflict, and thereby also indicate potential achievers of high status, an important factor in female mate selection. Although numerous studies were built on this assumption, nothing is known about the relationship between perceived facial dominance and physical strength in men. We measured hand-grip strength, as a measure of overall physical strength, in a sample of 32 male students, and recorded age, body weight, and height. Seventy-nine women rated facial images of these men for dominance, masculinity, and attractiveness. After controlling for age and body weight, hand-grip strength was found to correlate significantly positively with all three measures. The present data thus support the supposition that a male's physical strength is also signaled via facial characteristics of dominance and masculinity, which are considered attractive by women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17160983     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  42 in total

Review 1.  Faces and fitness: attractive evolutionary relationship or ugly hypothesis?

Authors:  James M Smoliga; Gerald S Zavorsky
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.

Authors:  Carmen E Lefevre; Peter J Etchells; Emma C Howell; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Assessment of physical strength from gait: data from the Maasai of Tanzania.

Authors:  Bernhard Fink; Marina L Butovskaya; Todd K Shackelford
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  The Faith of Sacrifice: Leadership Trade-Offs in an Afro-Brazilian Religion.

Authors:  Montserrat Soler
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-12

6.  Socio-sexuality and episodic memory function in women: further evidence of an adaptive "mating mode".

Authors:  David S Smith; Benedict C Jones; Kevin Allan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

7.  The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Lisa L M Welling
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

8.  Human's cognitive ability to assess facial cues from photographs: a study of sexual selection in the Bolivian Amazon.

Authors:  Eduardo A Undurraga; Dan T A Eisenberg; Oyunbileg Magvanjav; Ruoxue Wang; William R Leonard; Thomas W McDade; Victoria Reyes-García; Colleen Nyberg; Susan Tanner; Tomás Huanca; Ricardo A Godoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How well do men's faces and voices index mate quality and dominance?

Authors:  Leslie M Doll; Alexander K Hill; Michelle A Rotella; Rodrigo A Cárdenas; Lisa L M Welling; John R Wheatley; David A Puts
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-06

10.  Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers.

Authors:  Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Julie C Main; Anthony C Little; Lisa L M Welling; David R Feinberg; Bernard P Tiddeman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.