Literature DB >> 17157733

Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.

Raffaele Garofalo1, Brigitte M Jolles, Biagio Moretti, Olivier Siegrist.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and subjective outcomes after arthroscopic-assisted double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.
METHODS: A series of 15 patients with grade III isolated chronic PCL tears underwent double-bundle PCL reconstruction. Of these patients, 8 (53%) had simultaneous fractures. The mean time from accident to surgery was 10.8 months (range, 8 to 15 months). The mean age at the time of surgery was 28.2 years (range, 17 to 43 years). All of the patients reported knee insecurity during activities of daily living or light sporting activities, with associated anterior knee pain in 5 patients. Preoperatively, posterolateral or posteromedial corner injuries were ruled out through accurate clinical examination. The knees were assessed before surgery and at a mean follow-up of 3.2 years (range, 2 to 5 years) with a physical examination, 4 different rating scales, and stress radiographs obtained with a Telos device (Telos, Marburg, Germany).
RESULTS: Postoperative physical examination revealed a reduction of the posterior drawer and tibial step-off in all cases, although the posterior laxity was not completely normalized. Nevertheless, the patients were subjectively better after surgery. The subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score was significantly ameliorated. With regard to the objective International Knee Documentation Committee score, 6 knees (40%) were graded as abnormal because of posterior displacement of 6 mm or greater on follow-up stress radiographs with the Telos device. On the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the score was excellent in 13% of patients and good in 87%. The mean score on the Hospital for Special Surgery knee ligament rating scale was 85.8. The Tegner activity score showed an amelioration after surgery, but no patient resumed his or her preinjury level of activities. The postoperative stress radiographs revealed an improvement in posterior instability of 50% or more in all but 3 knees (20%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our technique of double-bundle PCL reconstruction produced a significant reduction in knee symptoms and allowed the patients to return to moderate or strenuous activity, although the posterior tibial translation was not completely normalized and our results appear to be no better than the results of single-bundle PCL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17157733     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  14 in total

1.  [Double-bundle technique--anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament].

Authors:  Alexander C Rauch; Philip B Schöttle; Knut Beitzel; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Accessory anterolateral portal in arthroscopic PCL reconstruction.

Authors:  Gun Woo Lee; Soo-Jin Jang; Young Choi; Jung-Hwan Son
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Augmentation or reconstruction of PCL? A quantitative review.

Authors:  Angelo Del Buono; Juri Radmilovic; Giuseppe Gargano; Salvatore Gatto; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Single and double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yield comparable clinical and functional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolas L Krott; Lawrence Wengle; Daniel Whelan; Michael Wild; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Derrick M Knapik; Varun Gopinatth; Garrett R Jackson; Jorge Chahla; Matthew V Smith; Matthew J Matava; Robert H Brophy
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-10-09

6.  A comparison of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Oog Jin Shon; Dong Chul Lee; Chul Hyun Park; Won Ho Kim; Kwang Am Jung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-05-04

Review 7.  Review: femoral tunnel placement for PCL reconstruction in relation to the PCL fibre bundle attachments.

Authors:  Sunil Apsingi; Anthony M J Bull; David J Deehan; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Double-bundle PCL reconstruction using tibial double cross-pin fixation.

Authors:  Hong Chul Lim; Ji Hoon Bae; Joon Ho Wang; Jae Hyuk Yang; Chang Woo Seok; Hak Jun Kim; Seung Joo Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  REHABILITATION FOLLOWING ISOLATED POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW OF PUBLISHED PROTOCOLS.

Authors:  Matthew Senese; Elliot Greenberg; J Todd Lawrence; Theodore Ganley
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

10.  POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH AUTOGRAFT OF THE DOUBLE SEMITENDINOSUS MUSCLES AND MIDDLE THIRD OF THE QUADRICEPS TENDON WITH DOUBLE FEMORAL AND SINGLE TIBIAL TUNNELS: CLINICAL RESULTS IN TWO YEARS FOLLOW UP.

Authors:  Ricardo de Paula Leite Cury; Nilson Roberto Severino; Osmar Pedro Arbix Camargo; Tatsuo Aihara; Victor Marques de Oliveira; Roger Avakian
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.