Literature DB >> 36209443

Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Derrick M Knapik1,2, Varun Gopinatth3, Garrett R Jackson4, Jorge Chahla4, Matthew V Smith5,6, Matthew J Matava5,6, Robert H Brophy5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the setting of persistent instability or failed non-operative management, surgical reconstruction is commonly recommended for isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears. The purpose of this study was to systematically review published studies to evaluate regional variation in the epidemiology of and surgical approaches to primary, isolated PCL reconstruction.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed in June 2022 to identify studies examining operative techniques during primary, isolated PCL reconstruction. Collected variables consisted of reconstruction technique, graft type, graft source, tibial reconstruction technique, femoral and tibial drilling and fixation methods, and whether the remnant PCL was preserved or debrided. Studies were classified into four global regions: Asia, Europe, North America, and South America.
RESULTS: Forty-five studies, consisting of 1461 total patients, were identified. Most of the included studies were from Asia (69%, n = 31/45). Single bundle reconstruction was more commonly reported in studies out of Asia, Europe, and North America. Hamstring autografts were utilized in 51.7% (n = 611/1181) of patients from Asia and 60.8% (n = 124/204) of patients from Europe. Trans-tibial drilling and outside-in femoral drilling were commonly reported in all global regions. The PCL remnant was generally debrided, while remnant preservation was commonly reported in studies from Asia.
CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of isolated PCL injuries varies by region, with the majority of published studies coming from Asia. Single-bundle reconstruction with hamstring autograft through a trans-tibial approach is the most commonly reported technique in the literature, with males reported to undergo isolated reconstruction more often than females. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, Level IV.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee; Posterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction; Regional variation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36209443      PMCID: PMC9548455          DOI: 10.1186/s40634-022-00541-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Orthop        ISSN: 2197-1153


  84 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts review: the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Gregory C Fanelli; John D Beck; Craig J Edson
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Treatments of Choice for Isolated, Full-Thickness Tears of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Nationwide Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Authors:  Adam Schumaier; Chelsea Minoughan; Andrew Jimenez; Brian Grawe
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Incidence and long-term follow-up of isolated posterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Thomas L Sanders; Ayoosh Pareek; Ian J Barrett; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Andrew J Bryan; Michael J Stuart; Bruce A Levy; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using hamstring tendon autograft and transosseous screw fixation: minimal 3 years follow-up.

Authors:  Seyed Taghi Norbakhsh; Zohreh Zafarani; Arvin Najafi; Hamidreza Aslani
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Isolated AL bundle reconstruction of the PCL.

Authors:  Matthias Lahner; Tobias Vogel; Lars Victor von Engelhardt; Martin S Schulz; Michael J Strobel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Posterior cruciate ligament injuries: evaluation and management.

Authors:  A J Cosgarea; P R Jay
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with use of a quadruple hamstring tendon graft with 3- to 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Chan; Shih-Chieh Yang; Chung-Hsun Chang; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen; Li-Jen Yuan; Kuo-Yao Hsu; Ching-Jen Wang
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 1: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas I Kennedy; Robert F LaPrade; Mary T Goldsmith; Scott C Faucett; Matthew T Rasmussen; Garrett A Coatney; Lars Engebretsen; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yongqian Li; Jia Li; Jianzhao Wang; Shijun Gao; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Arthroscopically pertinent anatomy of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Colin J Anderson; Connor G Ziegler; Coen A Wijdicks; Lars Engebretsen; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.