Literature DB >> 19288083

Review: femoral tunnel placement for PCL reconstruction in relation to the PCL fibre bundle attachments.

Sunil Apsingi1, Anthony M J Bull, David J Deehan, Andrew A Amis.   

Abstract

Accurate placement of the femoral tunnel position is an important aspect of cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. However, a wide range of positions have been described in the literature for the femoral tunnels for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal placement. It was hypothesised that some of the prior studies used femoral PCL graft tunnels that were outside of the anatomical attachments. A systematic review and descriptive anatomical study in vitro were undertaken. Fifty articles that described PCL reconstruction since 1917 were reviewed; the description of the femoral tunnel placement was reproducible from only 20 of these. A right, distal femur was disarticulated and the PCL attachment was dissected; the centres of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles were marked and confirmed to be close to the mean published data. The tunnel positions described in the 20 papers were also marked. The descriptions of 15 of the 20 anterolateral and 4 of the 5 posteromedial bundle tunnel centres were close (within +/-2 mm deep and +/-01:00 o'clock) to the anatomical centres of the bundle attachments. Other tunnels were placed either deeper or shallower than the anatomical attachments. The mean positions were: 7 mm from the articular cartilage at 1 o'clock for the anterolateral bundle, and 8 mm from the cartilage at 3 o'clock for the posteromedial bundle, in a right knee. It was concluded that it was not possible to replicate the tunnel positions used in most of the literature because of inadequate descriptions. Most of the usable descriptions of the anterolateral bundle position were close to the anatomical centre, but some tunnels were placed non-anatomically. A reproducible system for description of the femoral tunnel positions should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19288083     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0747-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  38 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  C D Harner; M A Janaushek; A Kanamori; M Yagi; T M Vogrin; S L Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Comparison of 1- and 2-incision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  S J Kim; S J Shin; H K Kim; J S Jahng; H S Kim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injuries. An anatomical, biomechanical and clinical review.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mariani; Roland Becker; Jeff Rihn; Fabrizio Margheritini
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I: The posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  E S Grood; M S Hefzy; T N Lindenfield
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Hatayama; Hiroshi Higuchi; Masashi Kimura; Yasukazu Kobayashi; Hiroto Asagumo; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2006-12

6.  Method for visualising and measuring the position of the femoral attachment of the ACL and ACL grafts in experimental work.

Authors:  T D Zavras; A A Amis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using four-strand hamstring tendon graft and interference screws.

Authors:  L A Pinczewski; P Thuresson; D Otto; F Nyquist
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  The human posterior cruciate ligament complex: an interdisciplinary study. Ligament morphology and biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  C D Harner; J W Xerogeanes; G A Livesay; G J Carlin; B A Smith; T Kusayama; S Kashiwaguchi; S L Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: minimal 3 years follow-up.

Authors:  Chih-Hwa Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Chun-Hsiung Shih; Shih-Wei Chou
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps tendon in chronic injuries.

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Roberto Buzzi; Daniele Lazzara
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  13 in total

1.  Accessory anterolateral portal in arthroscopic PCL reconstruction.

Authors:  Gun Woo Lee; Soo-Jin Jang; Young Choi; Jung-Hwan Son
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner deficiency results in a reverse pivot shift.

Authors:  Frank A Petrigliano; Clayton G Lane; Eduardo M Suero; Answorth A Allen; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Attachments of separate small bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Daisuke Hatsushika; Akimoto Nimura; Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Kumiko Yamaguchi; Takeshi Muneta; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  TransMedial All-Inside Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Reinforced Tibial Inlay Graft.

Authors:  Tamara J Nancoo; Breck Lord; Sam K Yasen; James O Smith; Michael J Risebury; Adrian J Wilson
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-10-07

5.  Location of the femoral tunnel aperture during single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outside-in versus inside-out techniques.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Kim; Hoon-Young Kim; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical outcomes of rectangular tunnel technique in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were comparable to the results of conventional round tunnel technique.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Woo-Sung Kim; Boo-Seop Kim; Hyun-Soo Ok; Jong-Heon Kim; Jeuk Lee; Young-Bok Jung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Inverted deltoid posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion accompanied with medial synovial fold: a case of a complex posterior cruciate ligament anatomical variation recalcitrant to conservative treatment.

Authors:  Ioannis Terzidis; Efthymios Papasoulis; Theodorakys Marin Fermin; Trifon Totlis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 8.  [The killer turn in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: mechanism and improvement].

Authors:  Yipeng Lin; Wufeng Cai; Xihao Huang; Jian Li; Qi Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

9.  Femoral graft-tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis with 3-dimensional models and cadaveric experiments.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Yong-Min Chun; Sung-Hwan Kim; Hong-Kyo Moon; Jae-Won Jang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Anatomical study of the posterior cruciate ligament with the knee flexed at 90°.

Authors:  Daniel Kyubin Cho; Sthéphano Pellizzaro Rosa; Guilherme Bello Prestes; Luiz Antônio Munhoz da Cunha; Márcio Fernando Aparecido de Moura; Edmar Stieven Filho
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.