Literature DB >> 19399475

Double-bundle PCL reconstruction using tibial double cross-pin fixation.

Hong Chul Lim1, Ji Hoon Bae, Joon Ho Wang, Jae Hyuk Yang, Chang Woo Seok, Hak Jun Kim, Seung Joo Kim.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical results of arthroscopic double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using double cross-pin fixation on the tibial side. Twenty-two patients who underwent PCL reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with double cross-pins for tibial fixation were evaluated. There were 19 men and 3 women with mean age 36 years (range 18-59), and the average follow-up period was 33 months (range 24-60). Preoperative and postoperative knee functions were evaluated in all patients using Lysholm knee scores, the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grades, and Tegner activity scores. Median Lysholm knee scores were 64 (50-75) preoperatively and 88 (82-96), 89.9 +/- 6.5 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Median side-to-side differences, determined using Telos stress radiographs, were 11 mm (8-14) preoperatively, and 3 mm (1-7) at final follow-up visits (P < 0.01). According to KT-2000 arthrometer measurements, mean side-to-side differences were 11 mm (8-13) preoperatively and 3 mm (1-6, P < 0.01) at final follow-up visits (P < 0.01). Preoperatively the 2000 IKDC evaluation system rated all patients as abnormal or severely abnormal (C or D), and at final follow-up visits, 20 patients (88%) were rated as normal or nearly normal (A or B) and 2 patients (12%) were rated as abnormal (C). Median preinjury and preoperative Tegner scores were 7 (range 5-9) and 3 (range 2-5), respectively, and the mean postoperative Tegner score was 6 (range 3-9). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Our study shows that arthroscopic double-bundle PCL reconstruction using an Achilles allograft with double cross-pins for tibial fixation provides satisfactory clinical results given a mean follow-up of 33 months. We believe that this method provides a reliable alternative technique of PCL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19399475     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0812-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  36 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  C D Harner; M A Janaushek; A Kanamori; M Yagi; T M Vogrin; S L Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Initial fixation strength of two bioabsorbable pins for the fixation of hamstring grafts compared to interference screw fixation: single cycle and cyclic loading.

Authors:  Thore Zantop; Andre Weimann; Markus Rümmler; Joachim Hassenpflug; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques.

Authors:  Jong-Keun Seon; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Arthroscopic double-bundle augmentation of posterior cruciate ligament using split Achilles allograft.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Yoon; Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Chan Teak Lim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: results with a minimum 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chih-Hwa Chen; Tai-Yuan Chuang; Kun-Chuang Wang; Wen-Jer Chen; Chun-Hsiung Shih
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Hatayama; Hiroshi Higuchi; Masashi Kimura; Yasukazu Kobayashi; Hiroto Asagumo; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2006-12

7.  Arthroscopic tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert Brick Campbell; Susan S Jordan; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  One-incision endoscopic technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft.

Authors:  Chih-Hwa Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Chun-Hsiung Shih
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method.

Authors:  Young-Bok Jung; Ho-Joong Jung; Suk-Kee Tae; Yong-Seuk Lee; Kee-Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  9 in total

1.  Single-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bioabsorbable cross-pin tibial back side fixation.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Yong Seuk Lee; Sang-Hee Choi; Moon Jong Chang; Do Kyung Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Double-bundle technique--anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament].

Authors:  Alexander C Rauch; Philip B Schöttle; Knut Beitzel; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Long-term outcomes following single-bundle transtibial arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Tarek Boutefnouchet; Malek Bentayeb; Qutub Qadri; Salman Ali
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A security evaluation of the Rigid-fix crosses pin system used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in tibial fixation site.

Authors:  Huaqiang Fan; Jian Wang; Yangpan Fu; Huixiang Dong; Jianxiong Wang; Cong Tang; Changming Huang; Zhanjun Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-11-15

Review 5.  Operative management of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries improves stability and reduces the incidence of secondary osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wouter Schroven; G Vles; J Verhaegen; M Roussot; J Bellemans; S Konan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Derrick M Knapik; Varun Gopinatth; Garrett R Jackson; Jorge Chahla; Matthew V Smith; Matthew J Matava; Robert H Brophy
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-10-09

7.  Arthroscopic posteromedial drive-through test in posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a new diagnostic test.

Authors:  Kyung-Wook Nha; Ji-Hoon Bae; Jae-Ho Kwon; Jae-Gyun Kim; Dae-Yeon Jo; Hong-Chul Lim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  REHABILITATION FOLLOWING ISOLATED POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW OF PUBLISHED PROTOCOLS.

Authors:  Matthew Senese; Elliot Greenberg; J Todd Lawrence; Theodore Ganley
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

9.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Versus Achilles Tendon Bone Block Allograft.

Authors:  Brian Forsythe; Marc S Haro; Ljiljana Bogunovic; Michael J Collins; Thomas A Arns; Katie J Trella; Elizabeth F Shewman; Nikhil N Verma; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.