Literature DB >> 15622523

Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes?

Nancy J O Birkmeyer1, Philip P Goodney, Therese A Stukel, Bruce E Hillner, John D Birkmeyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) designates cancer centers as regional centers of excellence in research and patient care. Although these centers often advertise their superior outcomes, their relative performance has not been examined empirically. In the current study, the authors assessed whether patients at NCI cancer centers compared with patients at control hospitals had lower mortality rates after major cancer surgery.
METHODS: Using the national Medicare database (1994-1999), the authors assessed surgical mortality and late survival rates for 63,860 elderly patients undergoing resection for lung, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, bladder, or colon carcinoma. For assessing performance, patients treated at the 51 NCI cancer centers were compared with patients from 51 control hospitals with the highest volumes for each procedure. Mortality rates (surgical and 5-year rates) were adjusted for patient characteristics and residual differences in procedure volume.
RESULTS: NCI cancer centers had lower adjusted surgical mortality rates than control hospitals for 4 of the 6 procedures, including colectomy (5.4% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.026), pulmonary resection (6.3% vs. 7.9%; P = 0.010), gastrectomy (8.0% vs. 12.2%; P < 0.001), and esophagectomy (7.9% vs. 10.9%; P = 0.027). Nonsignificant trends toward lower adjusted operative mortality rates at NCI cancer centers were also observed for cystectomy and pancreatic resection. Among patients surviving surgery, however, there were no important differences in subsequent 5-year mortality rates between NCI cancer centers and control hospitals for any of the procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: For many cancer procedures, patients undergoing surgery at NCI-designated cancer centers had lower surgical mortality rates than those treated at comparably high-volume hospitals, but similar long-term survival rates. (c) 2004 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15622523     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  82 in total

1.  National Cancer Institute Cancer Center designation and 30-day mortality for hospitalized, immunocompromised cancer patients.

Authors:  Christopher R Friese; Jeffrey H Silber; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 2.  Shaping the future of surgery: the role of private regulation in determining quality standards.

Authors:  Rachael A Callcut; Tara M Breslin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Cancer care in the developed world: A comparison of surgical oncology training programs.

Authors:  Motaz Qadan; Andrew R Davies; Hiram C Polk; William H Allum; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Hospital academic status and value of care for nonmetastatic colon cancer.

Authors:  Christine M Veenstra; Andrew J Epstein; Kaijun Liao; Jennifer J Griggs; Craig E Pollack; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Is esophagectomy the paradigm for volume-outcome relationships?

Authors:  Brian E Louie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  The effect of care setting in the delivery of high-value colon cancer care.

Authors:  Christine M Veenstra; Andrew J Epstein; Kaijun Liao; Arden M Morris; Craig E Pollack; Katrina A Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Hospital Volume and Survival After Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis.

Authors:  Ali A Mokdad; Hong Zhu; Jorge A Marrero; John C Mansour; Amit G Singal; Adam C Yopp
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity.

Authors:  Kevin R Kasten; Adam C Celio; Lauren Trakimas; Mark L Manwaring; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Population-based review of the outcomes following hepatic resection in a Canadian health region.

Authors:  Elijah Dixon; Oliver F Bathe; Andrew McKay; Isabelle You; Scot Dowden; David Sadler; Kelly W Burak; J Gregory McKinnon; Walter Miller; Francis R Sutherland
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go?

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Angela Fagerlin; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.