Literature DB >> 17153422

A quality assurance program for the on-board imagers.

Sua Yoo1, Gwe-Ya Kim, Rabih Hammoud, Eric Elder, Todd Pawlicki, Huaiqun Guan, Timothy Fox, Gary Luxton, Fang-Fang Yin, Peter Munro.   

Abstract

To develop a quality assurance (QA) program for the On-Board Imager (OBI) system and to summarize the results of these QA tests over extended periods from multiple institutions. Both the radiographic and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) mode of operation have been evaluated. The QA programs from four institutions have been combined to generate a series of tests for evaluating the performance of the On-Board Imager. The combined QA program consists of three parts: (1) safety and functionality, (2) geometry, and (3) image quality. Safety and functionality tests evaluate the functionality of safety features and the clinical operation of the entire system during the tube warm-up. Geometry QA verifies the geometric accuracy and stability of the OBI/CBCT hardware/software. Image quality QA monitors spatial resolution and contrast sensitivity of the radiographic images. Image quality QA for CBCT includes tests for Hounsfield Unit (HU) linearity, HU uniformity, spatial linearity, and scan slice geometry, in addition. All safety and functionality tests passed on a daily basis. The average accuracy of the OBI isocenter was better than 1.5 mm with a range of variation of less than 1 mm over 8 months. The average accuracy of arm positions in the mechanical geometry QA was better than 1 mm, with a range of variation of less than 1 mm over 8 months. Measurements of other geometry QA tests showed stable results within tolerance throughout the test periods. Radiographic contrast sensitivity ranged between 2.2% and 3.2% and spatial resolution ranged between 1.25 and 1.6 lp/mm. Over four months the CBCT images showed stable spatial linearity, scan slice geometry, contrast resolution (1%; <7 mm disk) and spatial resolution (>6 lp/cm). The HU linearity was within +/-40 HU for all measurements. By combining test methods from multiple institutions, we have developed a comprehensive, yet practical, set of QA tests for the OBI system. Use of the tests over extended periods show that the OBI system has reliable mechanical accuracy and stable image quality. Nevertheless, the tests have been useful in detecting performance deficits in the OBI system that needed recalibration. It is important that all tests are performed on a regular basis.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17153422     DOI: 10.1118/1.2362872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  51 in total

Review 1.  A review of image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  George T Y Chen; Gregory C Sharp; Shinichiro Mori
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-12-16

2.  Quality assurance for kilo- and megavoltage in-room imaging and localization for off- and online setup error correction.

Authors:  James M Balter; Larry E Antonuk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Anniversary paper. Development of x-ray computed tomography: the role of medical physics and AAPM from the 1970s to present.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Jeffrey Siewerdsen; Patrick J La Riviere; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Geometric calibration of a mobile C-arm for intraoperative cone-beam CT.

Authors:  M J Daly; J H Siewerdsen; Y B Cho; D A Jaffray; J C Irish
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Fast reconstruction of digital tomosynthesis using on-board images.

Authors:  Hui Yan; Devon J Godfrey; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Development of a QA phantom and automated analysis tool for geometric quality assurance of on-board MV and kV x-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Louis Lee; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Investigation into image quality and dose for different patient geometries with multiple cone-beam CT systems.

Authors:  Stephen J Gardner; Matthew T Studenski; Tawfik Giaddui; Yunfeng Cui; James Galvin; Yan Yu; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Long-term stability and mechanical characteristics of kV digital imaging system for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mingyao Zhu; Thomas Botticello; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Brian Winey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality.

Authors:  Da-Hye Choi; Bo-Ram Choi; Jin-Woo Choi; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Soon-Chul Choi; Sam-Sun Lee
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-03-11

10.  Image quality and stability of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) devices: A comparative study.

Authors:  Markus Stock; Marlies Pasler; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Peter Homolka; Richard Poetter; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.