Literature DB >> 23526047

Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality.

Da-Hye Choi1, Bo-Ram Choi, Jin-Woo Choi, Kyung-Hoe Huh, Won-Jin Yi, Min-Suk Heo, Soon-Chul Choi, Sam-Sun Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to suggest reference line-pair values of panoramic images with clinically desirable qualities using an arch-form phantom stand.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The line-pair test phantom was chosen. A real skull model was selected for setting the arch-form model of the phantom stand. The phantom stand had slits in four regions (incisor, premolar, molar, TMJ). Four raw images of the test phantom in each region and one raw image of the real skull were converted into 50 test phantom images and 50 skull phantom images with various line-pair values. 50 post-processed real skull phantom images were divided into 4 groups and were randomly submitted to 14 evaluators. Image quality was graded on a 4 point scale (1. good, 2. normal, 3. poor but interpretable, and 4. not interpretable). The reference line pair was determined as the first line-pair value scored less than 2 points. RESULT: The mean scores tended to decrease as the line-pair values increased. The reference line-pair values were 3.19 LP/mm in the incisor, 2.32 LP/mm in the premolar and TMJ, and 1.88 LP/mm in the molar region.
CONCLUSION: Image quality evaluation methods and criteria should be able to assess various regions considering the characteristics of panoramic systems. This study suggested overall and regional reference line-pair values and established a set of standard values for them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phantom, Imaging; Quality Assurance; Radiography, Panoramic

Year:  2013        PMID: 23526047      PMCID: PMC3604374          DOI: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.1.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent        ISSN: 2233-7822


  3 in total

1.  A quality assurance program for the on-board imagers.

Authors:  Sua Yoo; Gwe-Ya Kim; Rabih Hammoud; Eric Elder; Todd Pawlicki; Huaiqun Guan; Timothy Fox; Gary Luxton; Fang-Fang Yin; Peter Munro
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics.

Authors:  Arun Gopal; Sanjiv S Samant
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dimensions and form of dental arches in subjects with normal occlusions.

Authors:  M Raberin; B Laumon; J L Martin; F Brunner
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.650

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Impact of malpositioning on panoramic radiography in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Björn Riecke; Reinhard E Friedrich; Dirk Schulze; Clemens Loos; Marco Blessmann; Max Heiland; Johannes Wikner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Correlation between spatial resolution and ball distortion rate of panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Han-Gyeol Yeom; Jo-Eun Kim; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 3.  The Chairside Periodontal Diagnostic Toolkit: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Tae-Jun Ko; Kevin M Byrd; Shin Ae Kim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-22

4.  Contrast reference values in panoramic radiographic images using an arch-form phantom stand.

Authors:  Jae-Myung Shin; Chena Lee; Jo-Eun Kim; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Soon-Chul Choi; Sam-Sun Lee
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-09-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.