Literature DB >> 26154418

Six Challenges for Ethical Conduct in Science.

Petteri Niemi1,2.   

Abstract

The realities of human agency and decision making pose serious challenges for research ethics. This article explores six major challenges that require more attention in the ethics education of students and scientists and in the research on ethical conduct in science. The first of them is the routinization of action, which makes the detection of ethical issues difficult. The social governance of action creates ethical problems related to power. The heuristic nature of human decision making implies the risk of ethical bias. The moral disengagement mechanisms represent a human tendency to evade personal responsibility. The greatest challenge of all might be the situational variation in people's ethical behaviour. Even minor situational factors have a surprisingly strong influence on our actions. Furthermore, finally, the nature of ethics itself also causes problems: instead of clear answers, we receive a multitude of theories and intuitions that may sometimes be contradictory. All these features of action and ethics represent significant risks for ethical conduct in science. I claim that they have to be managed within the everyday practices of science and addressed explicitly in research ethics education. I analyse them and suggest some ways in which their risks can be alleviated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethical decision making; Ethical guidelines; Ethical pluralism; Ethical reviews; Ethical situationism; Heuristics; Human agency; Moral disengagement mechanisms; Research ethics; Research ethics education

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26154418     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9676-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  13 in total

1.  The ethical bureaucracy.

Authors:  Christopher Martyn
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2003-05

2.  Case-based knowledge and ethics education: improving learning and transfer through emotionally rich cases.

Authors:  Chase E Thiel; Shane Connelly; Lauren Harkrider; Lynn D Devenport; Zhanna Bagdasarov; James F Johnson; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The smell of virtue: clean scents promote reciprocity and charity.

Authors:  Katie Liljenquist; Chen-Bo Zhong; Adam D Galinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-02-04

4.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Moral heuristics.

Authors:  Cass R Sunstein
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.579

8.  Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?

Authors:  Murray Dyck; Gary Allen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Effect of feeling good on helping: cookies and kindness.

Authors:  A M Isen; P F Levin
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1972-03

10.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Daniel Nettle; Gilbert Roberts
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.