Literature DB >> 17148328

Doing the twist: A test of Darwin's cross-pollination hypothesis for pollinarium reconfiguration.

Craig I Peter1, Steven D Johnson.   

Abstract

Mating success in plants depends largely on the efficiency of pollen dispersal. For hermaphrodite plants, self-pollination, either within or among flowers, can reduce mating opportunities because of pollen and ovule discounting and inbreeding depression. Self-pollination may be particularly detrimental in plants such as orchids and asclepiads that package each flower's pollen into one or more pollinia which, together with accessory structures, comprise a pollinarium. Darwin proposed that physical reconfiguration of pollinaria serves as a mechanism for reducing the likelihood of self-pollination. To be effective, the time taken for pollinarium reconfiguration would need to exceed that spent by a pollinator on a plant. We investigated pollinarium reconfiguration (including pollinarium bending, pollinium shrinking and anther cap retention) in 19 species and found a strong positive relationship between reconfiguration time and the duration of pollinator visits. Reconfiguration times were also consistently longer than pollinator visit times. These results provide strong support for Darwin's idea that this mechanism promotes cross-pollination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148328      PMCID: PMC1617176          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

1.  Pollination: flexible style that encourages outcrossing.

Authors:  Q J Li; Z F Xu; W J Kress; Y M Xia; L Zhang; X B Deng; J Y Gao; Z L Bai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant.

Authors:  Christopher R Herlihy; Christopher G Eckert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The evolution of plant sexual diversity.

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Solving the puzzle of mirror-image flowers.

Authors:  Linley K Jesson; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Adaptive plasticity of floral display size in animal-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  The evolution of polymorphic sexual systems in daffodils (Narcissus).

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Evolution of reproductive strategies in the sexually deceptive orchid Ophrys sphegodes: how does flower-specific variation of odor signals influence reproductive success?

Authors:  M Ayasse; F P Schiestl; H F Paulus; C Löfstedt; B Hansson; F Ibarra; W Francke
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  A phylogenetic analysis of the Orchidaceae: evidence from rbcL nucleotide.

Authors:  K M Cameron; M W Chase; W M Whitten; P J Kores; D C Jarrell; V A Albert; T Yukawa; H G Hills; D H Goldman
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 9.  Sexual interference of the floral kind.

Authors:  S C H Barrett
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio.

Authors:  Steven D Johnson; Craig I Peter; Jon Agren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Anther cap retention prevents self-pollination by elaterid beetles in the South African orchid Eulophia foliosa.

Authors:  Craig I Peter; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Experimental fertilization increases amino acid content in floral nectar, fruit set and degree of selfing in the orchid Gymnadenia conopsea.

Authors:  Pieter Gijbels; Tobias Ceulemans; Wim Van den Ende; Olivier Honnay
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Large pollen loads of a South African asclepiad do not interfere with the foraging behaviour or efficiency of pollinating honey bees.

Authors:  G Coombs; A P Dold; E I Brassine; C I Peter
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-06-28

4.  Pollinaria Reconfiguration Mechanism of Widespread Euro-Mediterranean Orchids: The Effects of Increasing Air Temperature.

Authors:  Micaela Lanzino; Anna Maria Palermo; Giuseppe Pellegrino
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17

5.  A pollinator shift explains floral divergence in an orchid species complex in South Africa.

Authors:  Craig I Peter; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Flower orientation in Gloriosa superba (Colchicaceae) promotes cross-pollination via butterfly wings.

Authors:  Ryan J Daniels; Steven D Johnson; Craig I Peter
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Reproductive biology of Acrolophia cochlearis (Orchidaceae): estimating rates of cross-pollination in epidendroid orchids.

Authors:  Craig I Peter; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  A generalized deceptive pollination system of Doritis pulcherrima (Aeridinae: Orchidaceae) with non-reconfigured pollinaria.

Authors:  Jin Xiaohua; Li Dezhu; Ren Zongxin; Xiang Xiaoguo
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.215

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.