Literature DB >> 11209776

Evolution of reproductive strategies in the sexually deceptive orchid Ophrys sphegodes: how does flower-specific variation of odor signals influence reproductive success?

M Ayasse1, F P Schiestl, H F Paulus, C Löfstedt, B Hansson, F Ibarra, W Francke.   

Abstract

The orchid Ophrys sphegodes Miller is pollinated by sexually excited males of the solitary bee Andrena nigroaenea, which are lured to the flowers by visual cues and volatile semiochemicals. In O. sphegodes, visits by pollinators are rare. Because of this low frequency of pollination, one would expect the evolution of strategies that increase the chance that males will visit more than one flower on the same plant; this would increase the number of pollination events on a plant and therefore the number of seeds produced. Using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses, we identified more than 100 compounds in the odor bouquets of labellum extracts from O. sphegodes; 24 compounds were found to be biologically active in male olfactory receptors based on gas chromatography with electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD). Gas chromatography (GC) analyses of odors from individual flowers showed less intraspecific variation in the odor bouquets of the biologically active compounds as compared to nonactive compounds. This can be explained by a higher selective pressure on the pollinator-attracting communication signal. Furthermore, we found a characteristic variation in the GC-EAD active esters and aldehydes among flowers of different stem positions within an inflorescence and in the n-alkanes and n-alkenes among plants from different populations. In our behavioral field tests, we showed that male bees learn the odor bouquets of individual flowers during mating attempts and recognize them in later encounters. Bees thereby avoid trying to mate with flowers they have visited previously, but do not avoid other flowers either of a different or the same plant. By varying the relative proportions of saturated esters and aldehydes between flowers of different stem positions, we demonstrated that a plant may take advantage of the learning abilities of the pollinators and influence flower visitation behavior. Sixty-seven percent of the males that visited one flower in an inflorescence returned to visit a second flower of the same inflorescence. However, geitonogamy is prevented and the likelihood of cross-fertilization is enhanced by the time required for the pollinium deposited on the pollinator to complete its bending movement, which is necessary for pollination to occur. Cross-fertilization is furthermore enhanced by the high degree of odor variation between plants. This variation minimizes learned avoidance of the flowers and increases the likelihood that a given pollinator would visit several to many different plants within a population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11209776     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01243.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  44 in total

1.  How an orchid harms its pollinator.

Authors:  Bob B M Wong; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Floral and vegetative cues in oil-secreting and non-oil-secreting Lysimachia species.

Authors:  I Schäffler; F Balao; S Dötterl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Floral scent in a sexually deceptive Ophrys orchid: from headspace collections to solvent extractions.

Authors:  Pietro Zito; Sergio Rosselli; Maurizio Bruno; Antonella Maggio; Maurizio Sajeva
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2018-12-03

4.  Doing the twist: A test of Darwin's cross-pollination hypothesis for pollinarium reconfiguration.

Authors:  Craig I Peter; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids.

Authors:  Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-06

6.  Beetle visitations, and associations with quantitative variation of attractants in floral odors of Homalomena propinqua (Araceae).

Authors:  Yuko Kumano-Nomura; Ryohei Yamaoka
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Floral polymorphism and the fitness implications of attracting pollinating and florivorous insects.

Authors:  Marinus L de Jager; Allan G Ellis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Intensity and the ratios of compounds in the scent of snapdragon flowers affect scent discrimination by honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Amy Lutmerding; Natalia Dudareva; Brian H Smith
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Pollinator attraction in a sexually deceptive orchid by means of unconventional chemicals.

Authors:  Manfred Ayasse; Florian P Schiestl; Hannes F Paulus; Fernando Ibarra; Wittko Francke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Hybrid floral scent novelty drives pollinator shift in sexually deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Nicolas J Vereecken; Salvatore Cozzolino; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.