Literature DB >> 24107684

A pollinator shift explains floral divergence in an orchid species complex in South Africa.

Craig I Peter1, Steven D Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Floral diversification driven by shifts between pollinators has been one of the key explanations for the radiation of angiosperms. According to the Grant-Stebbins model of pollinator-driven speciation, these shifts result in morphologically distinct 'ecotypes' which may eventually become recognizable as species. The current circumscription of the food-deceptive southern African orchid Eulophia parviflora encompasses a highly variable monophyletic species complex. In this study, two forms were identified within this complex that differ in distribution, floral morphology, scent chemistry and phenology, and a test was made of whether these differences represent adaptations for different pollinators. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of floral and vegetative traits revealed that there are at least two discrete morphological forms in the species complex. Field observations revealed that each form is pollinated by a different insect species, and thus represent distinct ecotypes. The early-flowering coastal form which has long spurs and floral scent dominated by sesquiterpene compounds is pollinated exclusively by the long-tongued bee Amegilla fallax (Apidae, Anthophorinae), while the late-flowering inland form with short spurs and floral scent dominated by benzenoid compounds is pollinated exclusively by the beetle Cyrtothyrea marginalis (Cetoniinae; Scarabaeidae). Choice experiments in a Y-maze olfactometer showed that beetles are preferentially attracted to the scent of the short-spurred form. A spur-shortening experiment showed that long spurs are required for effective pollination of the bee-pollinated form. Although it was initially thought likely that divergence occurred across a geographical pollinator gradient, plants of the long-spurred form were effectively pollinated when transplanted to an inland locality outside the natural coastal range of this form. Thus, the underlying geographical basis for the evolution of ecotypes in the E. parviflora complex remains uncertain, although early flowering in the long-spurred form to exploit the emergence of naïve bees may restrict this form to coastal areas where there is no frost that would damage flower buds. Later flowering of the short-spurred form coincides closely with the emergence of the pollinating beetles following winter frosts.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a shift between bee and beetle pollination as the main driver of floral divergence in an orchid species complex. Floral scent and spur length appear to be key traits in mediating this evolutionary transition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amegilla; Cetoniinae; Eulophia; Grant–Stebbins model; Orchidaceae; Y-maze olfactometer; bee pollination; beetle pollination; phenology; pollination ecotypes; pollinator-driven speciation; scent

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24107684      PMCID: PMC3890387          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  28 in total

1.  Anther cap retention prevents self-pollination by elaterid beetles in the South African orchid Eulophia foliosa.

Authors:  Craig I Peter; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms.

Authors:  V GRANT
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Floral polymorphism and the fitness implications of attracting pollinating and florivorous insects.

Authors:  Marinus L de Jager; Allan G Ellis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Phylogeny and radiation of pollination systems in DISA (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  S Johnson; H Linder; K Steiner
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  The evolution of beetle pollination in a South African orchid.

Authors:  K Steiner
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Do pollinator distributions underlie the evolution of pollination ecotypes in the Cape shrub Erica plukenetii?

Authors:  Timotheüs Van der Niet; Michael D Pirie; Adam Shuttleworth; Steven D Johnson; Jeremy J Midgley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Field capture of northern and western corn rootworm beetles relative to attractant structure and volatility.

Authors:  Leslie Hammack; Richard J Petroski
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Evolution and coexistence of pollination ecotypes in an African Gladiolus (Iridaceae).

Authors:  Bruce Anderson; Ronny Alexandersson; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Scarab beetleAnomala albopilosa albopilosa utilizes a more complex sex pheromone system than a similar speciesA. cuprea.

Authors:  W Soares Leal; M Hasegawa; M Sawada; M Ono; S Tada
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Identification of thoracic gland constituents from maleXylocopa spp. latreille (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) from arizona.

Authors:  J F Andersen; S L Buchmann; D Weisleder; R D Plattner; R L Minckley
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  21 in total

1.  Orchid conservation: making the links.

Authors:  Michael F Fay; Thierry Pailler; Kingsley W Dixon
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Pollinator shifts as triggers of speciation in painted petal irises (Lapeirousia: Iridaceae).

Authors:  Félix Forest; Peter Goldblatt; John C Manning; David Baker; Jonathan F Colville; Dion S Devey; Sarah Jose; Maria Kaye; Sven Buerki
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Floral adaptation to local pollinator guilds in a terrestrial orchid.

Authors:  Mimi Sun; Karin Gross; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Geographical differentiation in floral traits across the distribution range of the Patagonian oil-secreting Calceolaria polyrhiza: do pollinators matter?

Authors:  Andrea Cosacov; Andrea A Cocucci; Alicia N Sérsic
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Matching floral and pollinator traits through guild convergence and pollinator ecotype formation.

Authors:  Ethan Newman; John Manning; Bruce Anderson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Floral polymorphism and the fitness implications of attracting pollinating and florivorous insects.

Authors:  Marinus L de Jager; Allan G Ellis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Floral odour chemistry defines species boundaries and underpins strong reproductive isolation in sexually deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Michael R Whitehead
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Timotheüs Van der Niet; Rod Peakall; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Floral specialization and angiosperm diversity: phenotypic divergence, fitness trade-offs and realized pollination accuracy.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.276

10.  Do pollinator distributions underlie the evolution of pollination ecotypes in the Cape shrub Erica plukenetii?

Authors:  Timotheüs Van der Niet; Michael D Pirie; Adam Shuttleworth; Steven D Johnson; Jeremy J Midgley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.