Literature DB >> 22718954

Songbirds learn songs least degraded by environmental transmission.

Susan Peters1, Elizabeth P Derryberry, Stephen Nowicki.   

Abstract

Communication depends on accurate reception of signals by receivers, and selection acts on signals to transmit efficiently through the environment. Although learnt signals, such as birdsong, vary in their transmission properties through different habitats, few studies have addressed the role of cultural selection in driving acoustic adaptation. Here, we present a test of the hypothesis that song-learning birds choose to copy songs that are less degraded by transmission through the environment, using swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana) as our study species. We found that all subjects discriminated between undegraded and naturally degraded song models, and learnt only from undegraded song models, demonstrating a role for cultural selection in acoustic adaptation of learnt signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22718954      PMCID: PMC3440999          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  6 in total

1.  Permissiveness in the learning and development of song syntax in swamp sparrows.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Bird song, ecology and speciation.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Thomas B Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Differences in visual signal design and detectability between allopatric populations of anolis lizards.

Authors:  Manuel Leal
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Selective vocal learning in a sparrow.

Authors:  P Marler; S Peters
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cities change the songs of birds.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Ardie den Boer-Visser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Quality of song learning affects female response to male bird song.

Authors:  Stephen Nowicki; William A Searcy; Susan Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Learning to cope: vocal adjustment to urban noise is correlated with prior experience in black-capped chickadees.

Authors:  Stefanie E LaZerte; Hans Slabbekoorn; Ken A Otter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster).

Authors:  Dana M Green; Tucker Scolman; O'neil W Guthrie; Bret Pasch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  White-crowned sparrow males show immediate flexibility in song amplitude but not in song minimum frequency in response to changes in noise levels in the field.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Derryberry; Katherine Gentry; Graham E Derryberry; Jennifer N Phillips; Raymond M Danner; Julie E Danner; David A Luther
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Deer browsing alters sound propagation in temperate deciduous forests.

Authors:  Timothy J Boycott; Jingyi Gao; Megan D Gall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Patterns of Song across Natural and Anthropogenic Soundscapes Suggest That White-Crowned Sparrows Minimize Acoustic Masking and Maximize Signal Content.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Derryberry; Raymond M Danner; Julie E Danner; Graham E Derryberry; Jennifer N Phillips; Sara E Lipshutz; Katherine Gentry; David A Luther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Acoustic adaptation to city noise through vocal learning by a songbird.

Authors:  Dana Lynn Moseley; Graham Earnest Derryberry; Jennifer Nicole Phillips; Julie Elizabeth Danner; Raymond Michael Danner; David Andrew Luther; Elizabeth Perrault Derryberry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 5.349

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.