Literature DB >> 20567804

[Filler materials for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral fractures].

M Arabmotlagh1, M Rauschmann.   

Abstract

In the recent years augmentation of vertebral compression fracture has been widely used with satisfactory clinical results. The filler materials for use in vertebral body augmentation have to meet many requirements. They should be biocompatible, be able to stabilize the fractured vertebral body, and their biomechanical properties should approximate those of cancellous bone. Furthermore, for a minimally invasive method that involves percutaneous injection of bone substitutes, the materials should be injectable and possess good radiopacity for the fluoroscopically guided procedure. At the present, polymethylmethacrylate is the most commonly used filler material for vertebral body augmentation. Due to the lack of bioactivity of polymethylmethacrylate that remains as an inert material in the bony tissue, new resorbable filler materials like calcium phosphate cement are increasingly in the focus of interest. In the following paper, the currently used filler materials for vertebral body augmentation and their characteristics are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567804     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-010-1619-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  33 in total

Review 1.  The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  D T Gold
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Clinical results of an open prospective study of a bis-GMA composite in percutaneous vertebral augmentation.

Authors:  Jean Palussière; Jérôme Berge; Afshin Gangi; Anne Cotten; Anne Pasco; Rudolf Bertagnoli; Hans Jaksche; Paolo Carpeggiani; Hervé Deramond
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Bioceramic vertebral augmentation with a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite composite (Cerament SpineSupport): in vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael Rauschmann; Thomas Vogl; Akhil Verheyden; Robert Pflugmacher; Thomas Werba; Sven Schmidt; Johannes Hierholzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement.

Authors:  Andreas Boger; Paul Heini; Markus Windolf; Erich Schneider
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Rod S Taylor; Rebecca J Taylor; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Response of a calcium sulfate bone graft substitute in a confined cancellous defect.

Authors:  W R Walsh; P Morberg; Y Yu; J L Yang; W Haggard; P C Sheath; M Svehla; W J M Bruce
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Assessment of bone viability after heat trauma. A histological, histochemical and vital microscopic study in the rabbit.

Authors:  R A Eriksson; T Albrektsson; B Magnusson
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984

8.  The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Lutz Peter Nolte; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Suitability of a calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebral body fracture augmentation: a controlled, randomized, clinical trial of balloon kyphoplasty comparing calcium phosphate versus polymethylmethacrylate.

Authors:  Thomas R Blattert; Leonie Jestaedt; Arnulf Weckbach
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Comparison of an experimental bone cement with surgical Simplex P, Spineplex and Cortoss.

Authors:  D Boyd; M R Towler; A Wren; O M Clarkin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients?

Authors:  Jan Philipp Kolb; Rebecca A Kueny; Klaus Püschel; Andreas Boger; Johannes M Rueger; Michael M Morlock; Gerd Huber; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluation of injectable silica-embedded nanohydroxyapatite bone substitute in a rat tibia defect model.

Authors:  Weiguo Xu; Cornelia Ganz; Ulf Weber; Martin Adam; Gerd Holzhüter; Daniel Wolter; Bernhard Frerich; Brigitte Vollmar; Thomas Gerber
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2011-08-02

3.  Percutaneous vertebral augmentation with polyethylene mesh and allograft bone for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  C Schulz; U Kunz; U M Mauer; R Mathieu
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-01-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.