Literature DB >> 17138173

Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?

Sina Uckan1, Emre Dayangac, Kenan Araz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to demonstrate if articaine HCl could provide palatal anesthesia in maxillary tooth removal without the need for a second palatal injection. STUDY
DESIGN: Of 53 patients, 23 had bilateral and 30 had unilateral extractions. In the study group 2 mL of 4% articaine/HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine was injected into the buccal vestibule of the tooth. After 5 min the extraction was performed. 27 subjects were controls and subjected to the same protocol with palatal injection. All patients completed a Faces Pain Scale (FPS) and a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after extraction.
RESULTS: According to VAS and FPS scores, when permanent maxillary tooth removal with palatal injection (97.5%) and without palatal injection (96.8%) were compared the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05) [corrected].
CONCLUSION: Permanent removal of maxillary teeth without palatal injection is possible by depositing 2 mL articaine/HCl to the buccal vestibule of the tooth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17138173     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  27 in total

1.  Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.

Authors:  Nilesh V Rathi; Anushree A Khatri; Akshat G Agrawal; Sudhindra Baliga M; Nilima R Thosar; Shravani G Deolia
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

2.  Buccal injection of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine for the removal of maxillary third molars.

Authors:  Sunil Yadav; Ajay Verma; Akash Sachdeva
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2013

3.  Maxillary posterior teeth removal without palatal injection -truth or myth: a dilemma for oral surgeons.

Authors:  Kopal Sharma; Amit Sharma; Ml Aseri; Angelika Batta; Vikas Singh; Dinesh Pilania; Yogesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-11-20

Review 4.  Articaine use in children: a review.

Authors:  R Leith; K Lynch; A C O'Connell
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2012-12

5.  Comparison of the effectiveness of lidocaine in permanent maxillary teeth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumaresan; Balamanikanda Srinivasan; Sivakumar Pendayala
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-04-27

6.  Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine.

Authors:  Anand Vijay Somuri; A Bhagavandas Rai; Manju Pillai
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-08-24

7.  Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.

Authors:  Deepashri H Kambalimath; R S Dolas; H V Kambalimath; S M Agrawal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-04-05

8.  A comparison of equivalent doses of lidocaine and articaine in maxillary posterior tooth extractions: case series.

Authors:  Christopher C Friedl; Jill Bashutski; Navid Rashidi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-07-01

9.  Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Anwar B Bataineh; Majid A Alwarafi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 and 1 : 200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study.

Authors:  José Lacet Lima; Eduardo Dias-Ribeiro; Julierme Ferreira-Rocha; Ramon Soares; Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa; Song Fan; Eduardo Sant'ana
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.