Literature DB >> 23235128

Articaine use in children: a review.

R Leith1, K Lynch, A C O'Connell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lidocaine has been considered the gold standard for local analgesia agents in dentistry for years. Articaine is now widely used but there has been a reluctance to use it in children. REVIEW: Compared with lidocaine, articaine is 1.5 times as potent and only 0.6 times as toxic and has been shown to be superior in achieving successful anaesthesia following infiltration. The use of inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) can be almost eliminated in children by using articaine due to its ability to effectively anaesthetic teeth up to the first permanent molar region. In addition, diffusion of the anaesthetic agent onto the palatal surface may also eliminate the discomfort of palatal infiltration. Soft tissue analgesia may be prolonged, but the risk of other adverse reactions is similar to other local anaesthetic agents.
CONCLUSION: The use of articaine achieves successful pain control while reducing the volume administered and is advocated as a safe and effective alternative to lidocaine for use in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23235128     DOI: 10.1007/BF03320829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 1818-6300


  27 in total

1.  The effect of age on pharmacokinetics of the local anesthetic drug articaine.

Authors:  R Oertel; U Ebert; R Rahn; W Kirch
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Comparison of articaine 4% and lidocaine 2% in paediatric dental patients.

Authors:  D Ram; E Amir
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Comparison of the efficacy of articaine and prilocaine local anaesthesia for pulpotomy of maxillary and mandibular primary molars.

Authors:  Y Yilmaz; O Eyuboglu; S Keles
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic.

Authors:  S F Malamed; S Gagnon; D Leblanc
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and mepivacaine in pediatric patients: a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Mesut Enes Odabaş; Cagdas Cınar; Ceren Deveci; Alev Alaçam
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.874

6.  Effectiveness of mandibular infiltration in children using the local anesthetic Ultracaine (articaine hydrochloride).

Authors:  A Dudkiewicz; S Schwartz; R Laliberté
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  M D Kanaa; J M Whitworth; I P Corbett; J G Meechan
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.264

8.  Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars.

Authors:  Ian P Corbett; Mohammad D Kanaa; John M Whitworth; John G Meechan
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks--an update to include articaine.

Authors:  M Anthony Pogrel
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2007-04

10.  A 21 year retrospective study of reports of paresthesia following local anesthetic administration.

Authors:  D A Haas; D Lennon
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparative clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations in 4% articaine for dental local infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; J Seeling; A Alshihri; M Daubländer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Local Anesthetic Usage Among Dentists: German and International Data.

Authors:  Frank Halling; Andreas Neff; Thomas Ziebart
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2021-03-01

3.  Does articaine, rather than lidocaine, increase the risk of nerve damage when administered for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients undergoing local anaesthesia for dental treatment? A mini systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  P Stirrup; S Crean
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Comparison of periodontal ligament injection and inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars pulpotomy: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Roza Haghgoo; Ferial Taleghani
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-05

5.  The Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and PSA Injection of 2% Lidocaine on Anesthesia of Maxillary Second Molars.

Authors:  Ensiyeh Maljaei; Maryam Pourkazemi; Milad Ghanizadeh; Rana Ranjbar
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017

Review 6.  Anesthetic efficacies of buccal with palatal injection versus buccal with intra-septal injection in permanent maxillary first molars of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Peecharat Areenoo; Chanika Manmontri; Nattakan Chaipattanawan; Papimon Chompu-Inwai; Manop Khanijou; Thongnard Kumchai; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-07-26

7.  Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study.

Authors:  K Jorgenson; L Burbridge; B Cole
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-12-12

8.  United Kingdom pediatric dentistry specialist views on the administration of articaine in children.

Authors:  Maryam Ezzeldin; Gemma Hanks; Mechelle Collard
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-10-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.