Literature DB >> 17135467

Contextual effects on smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Miriam Spering1, Karl R Gegenfurtner.   

Abstract

Segregating a moving object from its visual context is particularly relevant for the control of smooth-pursuit eye movements. We examined the interaction between a moving object and a stationary or moving visual context to determine the role of the context motion signal in driving pursuit. Eye movements were recorded from human observers to a medium-contrast Gaussian dot that moved horizontally at constant velocity. A peripheral context consisted of two vertically oriented sinusoidal gratings, one above and one below the stimulus trajectory, that were either stationary or drifted into the same or opposite direction as that of the target at different velocities. We found that a stationary context impaired pursuit acceleration and velocity and prolonged pursuit latency. A drifting context enhanced pursuit performance, irrespective of its motion direction. This effect was modulated by context contrast and orientation. When a context was briefly perturbed to move faster or slower eye velocity changed accordingly, but only when the context was drifting along with the target. Perturbing a context into the direction orthogonal to target motion evoked a deviation of the eye opposite to the perturbation direction. We therefore provide evidence for the use of absolute and relative motion cues, or motion assimilation and motion contrast, for the control of smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17135467     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01087.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  11 in total

1.  Cortical oscillatory changes in human middle temporal cortex underlying smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Benjamin T Dunkley; Tom C A Freeman; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Motion integration is anisotropic during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  David Souto; Jayesha Chudasama; Dirk Kerzel; Alan Johnston
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Orientation-dependent biases in length judgments of isolated stimuli.

Authors:  Jielei Emma Zhu; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Flexibility of foveal attention during ocular pursuit.

Authors:  Stephen J Heinen; Zhenlan Jin; Scott N J Watamaniuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Does the noise matter? Effects of different kinematogram types on smooth pursuit eye movements and perception.

Authors:  Alexander C Schütz; Doris I Braun; J Anthony Movshon; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Precision and accuracy of ocular following: influence of age and type of eye movement.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Tom H Margrain; Tom C A Freeman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Illusory motion reveals velocity matching, not foveation, drives smooth pursuit of large objects.

Authors:  Zheng Ma; Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Global-local consistency benefits memory-guided tracking of a moving target.

Authors:  Tingting Chen; Jinhong Ding; Guang H Yue; Haoqiang Liu; Jie Li; Changhao Jiang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Common and independent processing of visual motion perception and oculomotor response.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Tomoyuki Hayasaka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.