Literature DB >> 22110021

Cortical oscillatory changes in human middle temporal cortex underlying smooth pursuit eye movements.

Benjamin T Dunkley1, Tom C A Freeman, Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy, Krish D Singh.   

Abstract

Extra-striate regions are thought to receive non-retinal signals from the pursuit system to maintain perceptual stability during eye movements. Here, we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to study changes in oscillatory power related to smooth pursuit in extra-striate visual areas under three conditions: 'pursuit' of a small target, 'retinal motion' of a large background and 'pursuit + retinal motion' combined. All stimuli moved sinusoidally. MEG source reconstruction was performed using synthetic aperture magnetometry. Broadband alpha-beta suppression (5-25 Hz) was observed over bilateral extra-striate cortex (consistent with middle temporal cortex (MT+)) during all conditions. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using the same experimental protocols confirmed an MT+ localisation of this extra-striate response. The alpha-beta envelope power in the 'pursuit' condition showed a hemifield-dependent eye-position signal, such that the global minimum in the alpha-beta suppression recorded in extra-striate cortex was greatest when the eyes were at maximum contralateral eccentricity. The 'retinal motion' condition produced sustained alpha-beta power decreases for the duration of stimulus motion, while the 'pursuit + retinal motion' condition revealed a double-dip 'W' shaped alpha-beta envelope profile with the peak suppression contiguous with eye position when at opposing maximum eccentricity. These results suggest that MT+ receives retinal as well as extra-retinal signals from the pursuit system as part of the process that enables the visual system to compensate for retinal motion during eye movement. We speculate that the suppression of the alpha-beta rhythm reflects either the integration of an eye position-dependent signal or one that lags the peak velocity of the sinusoidally moving target.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22110021      PMCID: PMC6869956          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  42 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of pursuit eye movements in humans as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  L Petit; J V Haxby
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Perceiving depth order during pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  Jenny J Naji; Tom C A Freeman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  The neural basis of smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Peter Thier; Uwe J Ilg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Contextual effects on smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Attentional changes in pre-stimulus oscillatory activity within early visual cortex are predictive of human visual performance.

Authors:  Noriko Yamagishi; Daniel E Callan; Stephen J Anderson; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  fMRI evidence for sensorimotor transformations in human cortex during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  H Kimmig; S Ohlendorf; O Speck; A Sprenger; R M Rutschmann; S Haller; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  A model of visually-guided smooth pursuit eye movements based on behavioral observations.

Authors:  R J Krauzlis; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus suppresses oscillatory beta activity in patients with Parkinson's disease in parallel with improvement in motor performance.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; Florian Kempf; Christof Brücke; Louise Gaynor Doyle; Irene Martinez-Torres; Alek Pogosyan; Thomas Trottenberg; Andreas Kupsch; Gerd-Helge Schneider; Marwan I Hariz; Wim Vandenberghe; Bart Nuttin; Peter Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Evidence that smooth pursuit velocity, not eye position, modulates alpha and beta oscillations in human middle temporal cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin T Dunkley; Tom C A Freeman; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural correlates of apparent motion perception of impoverished facial stimuli: a comparison of ERP and ERSP activity.

Authors:  Alejandra Rossi; Francisco J Parada; Artemy Kolchinsky; Aina Puce
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Dynamic causal modelling of eye movements during pursuit: Confirming precision-encoding in V1 using MEG.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Markus Bauer; Dimitris Pinotsis; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Altered spontaneous brain activity pattern in patients with high myopia using amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation: a resting-state fMRI study.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Fu-Qing Zhou; Yu-Xiang Hu; Xiao-Xuan Xu; Xiong Zhou; Yu-Lin Zhong; Jun Wang; Xiao-Rong Wu
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Sex-differences in network level brain dynamics associated with pain sensitivity and pain interference.

Authors:  Junseok A Kim; Rachael L Bosma; Kasey S Hemington; Anton Rogachov; Natalie R Osborne; Joshua C Cheng; Benjamin T Dunkley; Karen D Davis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 5.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.