Literature DB >> 21149307

Does the noise matter? Effects of different kinematogram types on smooth pursuit eye movements and perception.

Alexander C Schütz1, Doris I Braun, J Anthony Movshon, Karl R Gegenfurtner.   

Abstract

We investigated how the human visual system and the pursuit system react to visual motion noise. We presented three different types of random-dot kinematograms at five different coherence levels. For transparent motion, the signal and noise labels on each dot were preserved throughout each trial, and noise dots moved with the same speed as the signal dots but in fixed random directions. For white noise motion, every 20 ms the signal and noise labels were randomly assigned to each dot and noise dots appeared at random positions. For Brownian motion, signal and noise labels were also randomly assigned, but the noise dots moved at the signal speed in a direction that varied randomly from moment to moment. Neither pursuit latency nor early eye acceleration differed among the different types of kinematograms. Late acceleration, pursuit gain, and perceived speed all depended on kinematogram type, with good agreement between pursuit gain and perceived speed. For transparent motion, pursuit gain and perceived speed were independent of coherence level. For white and Brownian motions, pursuit gain and perceived speed increased with coherence but were higher for white than for Brownian motion. This suggests that under our conditions, the pursuit system integrates across all directions of motion but not across all speeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21149307      PMCID: PMC3039843          DOI: 10.1167/10.13.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  75 in total

1.  Development of gaze tracking of small and large objects.

Authors:  Kerstin Rosander; Claes von Hofsten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Extrinsic factors in the perception of bistable motion stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Smooth pursuit eye movements to isoluminant targets.

Authors:  D I Braun; N Mennie; C Rasche; A C Schütz; M J Hawken; K R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spatial integration in human smooth pursuit.

Authors:  S J Heinen; S N Watamaniuk
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Offset dynamics of human smooth pursuit eye movements: effects of target presence and subject attention.

Authors:  J Pola; H J Wyatt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in monkey.

Authors:  E L Keller; N S Khan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of visual input.

Authors:  F A Miles; K Kawano; L M Optican
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Sensitivity of smooth eye movement to small differences in target velocity.

Authors:  E Kowler; S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Visual hyperacuity:spatiotemporal interpolation in human vision.

Authors:  M Fahle; T Poggio
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1981-11-24

10.  Optokinetic nystagmus with spontaneous reversal of transparent motion perception.

Authors:  K Watanabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Aperture extent and stimulus speed affect the perception of visual acceleration.

Authors:  Alexandra S Mueller; Esther G González; Chris McNorgan; Martin J Steinbach; Brian Timney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spatiotemporal Filter for Visual Motion Integration from Pursuit Eye Movements in Humans and Monkeys.

Authors:  Trishna Mukherjee; Bing Liu; Claudio Simoncini; Leslie C Osborne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Anticipatory smooth eye movements with random-dot kinematograms.

Authors:  Elio M Santos; Edinah K Gnang; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Different mechanisms for modulation of the initiation and steady-state of smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Stuart Behling; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Local motion pooling is continuous, global motion perception is discrete.

Authors:  Marshall L Green; Michael S Pratte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Audiovisual associations alter the perception of low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Can Oluk
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-31

7.  Noisy decision thresholds can account for suboptimal detection of low coherence motion.

Authors:  Nicholas S C Price; John B VanCuylenberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The reverse motion illusion in random dot motion displays and implications for understanding development.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Kimberly Meier; Deborah Giaschi
Journal:  J Illusion       Date:  2022-01-10

9.  The role of frontal pursuit area in interaction between smooth pursuit eye movements and attention: A TMS study.

Authors:  Zhenlan Jin; Ruie Gou; Junjun Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visual Motion and Form Integration in the Behaving Ferret.

Authors:  Erika Dunn-Weiss; Samuel U Nummela; Augusto A Lempel; Jody M Law; Johanna Ledley; Peter Salvino; Kristina J Nielsen
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.