Literature DB >> 19841914

Precision and accuracy of ocular following: influence of age and type of eye movement.

Andrew J Kolarik1, Tom H Margrain, Tom C A Freeman.   

Abstract

Previous work on ocular-following emphasises the accuracy of tracking eye movements. However, a more complete understanding of oculomotor control should account for variable error as well. We identify two forms of precision: 'shake', occurring over shorter timescales; 'drift', occurring over longer timescales. We show how these can be computed across a series of eye movements (e.g. a sequence of slow-phases or collection of pursuit trials) and then measure accuracy and precision for younger and older observers executing different types of eye movement. Overall, we found older observers were less accurate over a range of stimulus speeds and less precise at faster eye speeds. Accuracy declined more steeply for reflexive eye movements and shake was independent of speed. In all other instances, the two measures of precision expanded non-linearly with mean eye speed. We also found that shake during fixation was similar to shake for reflexive eye movement. The results suggest that deliberate and reflexive eye movement do not share a common non-linearity or a common noise source. The relationship of our data to previous studies is discussed, as are the consequences of imprecise eye movement for models of oculomotor control and perception during eye movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19841914     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2036-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  45 in total

1.  Degradation of stimulus selectivity of visual cortical cells in senescent rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  M T Schmolesky; Y Wang; M Pu; A G Leventhal
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Head-centred motion perception in the ageing visual system.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; Jenny J Naji; Tom H Margrain
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2002

3.  Effect of changing feedback delay on spontaneous oscillations in smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys.

Authors:  D Goldreich; R J Krauzlis; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Miniature eye movements enhance fine spatial detail.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Ramon Iovin; Martina Poletti; Fabrizio Santini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Sensitivity of smooth eye movement to small differences in target velocity.

Authors:  E Kowler; S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Motion and vision. I. Stabilized images of stationary gratings.

Authors:  D H Kelly
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-09

7.  Effect of retinal image motion on visual acuity and contour interaction in congenital nystagmus.

Authors:  S T Chung; H E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Slow eye movements.

Authors:  U J Ilg
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  The effects of age on a smooth pursuit tracking task in adults with schizophrenia and normal subjects.

Authors:  R G Ross; A Olincy; J G Harris; A Radant; L E Adler; N Compagnon; R Freedman
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Variables affecting eye tracking performance.

Authors:  J T Hutton; J A Nagel; R B Loewenson
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-11
View more
  7 in total

1.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Saccadic compensation for reflexive optokinetic nystagmus just as good as compensation for volitional pursuit.

Authors:  James J Harrison; Tom C A Freeman; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Discrimination contours for the perception of head-centered velocity.

Authors:  Rebecca A Champion; Tom C A Freeman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The distribution of quick phase interval durations in human optokinetic nystagmus.

Authors:  Jonathan Waddington; Christopher M Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A Bayesian model of perceived head-centered velocity during smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; Rebecca A Champion; Paul A Warren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Two-Dimensional Analysis of Horizontal and Vertical Pursuit in Infantile Nystagmus Reveals Quantitative Deficits in Accuracy and Precision.

Authors:  Lee Mcilreavy; Tom C A Freeman; Jonathan T Erichsen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Two-Dimensional Analysis of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements Reveals Quantitative Deficits in Precision and Accuracy.

Authors:  Lee Mcilreavy; Tom C A Freeman; Jonathan T Erichsen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.