Literature DB >> 17135340

Evaluation of a new soft tipped injector for the implantation of foldable intraocular lenses.

Guy Kleinmann1, David J Apple.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the R-INJ-04 soft-tipped injector, a new injector with an integral round nozzle manufactured by Rayner Intraocular Lenses, England.
METHODS: 16 Rayner C-flex intraocular lenses (IOLs; Rayner Intraocular lenses, England) ranging between +10 and +30 D (2 for each power) were tested. An ophthalmic viscoelastic device (Healon, AMO, Santa Ana, California, USA) was applied to the injectors. The IOLs were loaded according to the company injector's instructions for use and were injected into a Petri dish. After the injection, all the IOLs and nozzles were evaluated by gross (macroscopic) and microscopic analyses and photographed under a light microscope. One lens of each power and the cartridge used for the implantation were then sent for further analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The rest of the IOLs were tested for power and modulation transfer function (MTF).
RESULTS: All the injections were successful. No damage to the IOLs or to the injectors was found by gross examination, light microscopy and SEM. No deposits were found on the IOL optical surfaces or haptics. Power and MTF analysis showed a close match with the original measurements.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the R-INJ-04 soft-tipped injector is safe for the implantation of the C-flex IOL with power range from 10 to 30 D. No structural damage to the IOLs or to the injectors was found, and the lens power and light transmission properties were not damaged in any way by the injection process.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17135340      PMCID: PMC1954791          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.103192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  6 in total

1.  Linear deposits on the surfaces of intraocular lenses implanted through a hexagonal cartridge which mimic scratches/cracks on the lenses.

Authors:  G Kleinmann; A L Marcovich; D J Apple; N Mamalis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Forceps-induced scratching of a foldable acrylic intraocular lens.

Authors:  M P Vrabec; J C Syverud; C J Burgess
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-06

3.  Cracking of acrylic intraocular lenses during capsular bag insertion.

Authors:  K H Carlson; D W Johnson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

4.  Scanning electron microscopic analysis of foldable acrylic and hydrogel intraocular lenses.

Authors:  T Kohnen; G Magdowski; D D Koch
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Alterations to the AcrySof intraocular lens during folding.

Authors:  S Milazzo; P Turut; H Blin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Stress fractures after folding an acrylic intraocular lens.

Authors:  D R Pfister
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.258

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  A practical and easy surgical technique for recovery of an incarcerated haptic.

Authors:  Yusuf Koçluk; Emine Alyamaç Sukgen; Burcu Kasım; Oğuzhan Saygılı
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Descemet's tear due to injector cartridge tip deformity.

Authors:  Partha Biswas; Subhrangshu Sengupta; Ajoy Paul; Lav Kochgaway; Sayantan Biswas
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Prediction of refractive error in combined vitrectomy and cataract surgery with one-piece acrylic intraocular lens.

Authors:  Dong Kyu Lee; Sung Jin Lee; Yong Sung You
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.