Literature DB >> 17129624

Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility.

Lucie Schmidt1.   

Abstract

Infertility currently affects over 6 million individuals in the United States. While most health insurance plans nationwide do not cover infertility diagnoses or treatments, to date 15 states have enacted some form of infertility insurance mandate. In this paper, I use data from the Vital Statistics Detail Natality Data and Census population estimates to examine whether these state-level mandates were successful in increasing fertility rates. Using a difference-in-differences approach, I exploit variation in the enactment of mandates both across states and over time, and identify treatment and control groups that should have been differentially affected by infertility coverage. My results suggest that the mandates significantly increase first birth rates for women over 35, and these results are robust to a number of specification tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17129624      PMCID: PMC2096618          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.804


  14 in total

1.  Mental health parity legislation: much ado about nothing?

Authors:  R L Pacula; R Sturm
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Prevalence of employer self-insured health benefits: national and state variation.

Authors:  C H Park
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Tarun Jain; Bernard L Harlow; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The effects of state mental health parity legislation on perceived quality of insurance coverage, perceived access to care, and use of mental health specialty care.

Authors:  Yuhua Bao; Roland Sturm
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The incidence of mandated maternity benefits.

Authors:  J Gruber
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  1994-06

6.  Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage.

Authors:  Tarun Jain; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982-1995.

Authors:  A Chandra; E H Stephen
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

8.  Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates.

Authors:  Marianne Bitler; Lucie Schmidt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The economic cost of infertility-related services: an examination of the Massachusetts infertility insurance mandate.

Authors:  M Griffin; W F Panak
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility.

Authors:  Lucie Schmidt
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.804

View more
  22 in total

1.  Utilization of infertility treatments: the effects of insurance mandates.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Lucie Schmidt
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  Validity of Claims Data for the Identification of Male Infertility.

Authors:  Yash S Khandwala; Chiyuan A Zhang; Shufeng Li; Mark R Cullen; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Medicaid expansions and fertility in the United States.

Authors:  Thomas DeLeire; Leonard M Lopoo; Kosali I Simon
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2011-05

4.  Contraception Use, Abortions, and Births: The Effect of Insurance Mandates.

Authors:  Karen Mulligan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2015-08

5.  Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.

Authors:  Sara Crawford; Sheree L Boulet; Denise J Jamieson; Carol Stone; Jewel Mullen; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Effects of State Cervical Cancer Insurance Mandates on Pap Test Rates.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Christopher S Carpenter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Is direct access to obstetricians/gynecologists effective at improving maternal health behaviors?

Authors:  Christine Piette Durrance; Scott Hankins
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Health Insurance Mandates, Mammography, and Breast Cancer Diagnoses.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Christopher S Carpenter
Journal:  Am Econ J Econ Policy       Date:  2016-08

9.  Expensive but worth it: older parents' attitudes and opinions about the costs and insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin MacDougall; Anne C Davis; Yewoubdar Beyene
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Fiscal externalities of becoming a parent.

Authors:  Douglas A Wolf; Ronald D Lee; Timothy Miller; Gretchen Donehower; Alexandre Genest
Journal:  Popul Dev Rev       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.