Literature DB >> 10981189

Prevalence of employer self-insured health benefits: national and state variation.

C H Park1.   

Abstract

Many large employers prefer to self-insure health plans offered to employees rather than purchase them from insurance companies to save costs and to avoid the burden of complying with varying state mandates. This concerns state governments because they cannot directly regulate self-insured plans. This article describes the prevalence of employer self-insurance for the nation and by state in 1993 and examines what factors, especially state policies, contribute to the national and state variation in the prevalence of self-insurance. Data from the National Employer Health Insurance Survey on 34,604 private sector establishments are analyzed. Variation in the prevalence of self-insurance was largely explained by the firm size of the establishments. After all other factors were examined, very little was added to predict the rate of self-insurance for each state. While state premium taxation and benefits mandates were not associated with self-insurance, small-group reforms were significantly and positively associated with the probability of self-insurance.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10981189     DOI: 10.1177/107755870005700305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  6 in total

1.  Lessons from state mandates of preventive cancer screenings.

Authors:  Wendy Yi Xu; Bryan Dowd; Jean Abraham
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-03-15

2.  Does Limiting Allowable Rating Variation in the Small Group Health Insurance Market Affect Employer Self-Insurance?

Authors:  Erin Trish; Bradley Herring
Journal:  J Risk Insur       Date:  2016-10-03

3.  Modeling employer self-insurance decisions after the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Amado Cordova; Christine Eibner; Raffaele Vardavas; James Broyles; Federico Girosi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Sex differences in the temperature dependence of kidney stone presentations: a population-based aggregated case-crossover study.

Authors:  Ana M Vicedo-Cabrera; David S Goldfarb; Robert E Kopp; Lihai Song; Gregory E Tasian
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility.

Authors:  Lucie Schmidt
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.804

6.  Daily mean temperature and clinical kidney stone presentation in five U.S. metropolitan areas: a time-series analysis.

Authors:  Gregory E Tasian; Jose E Pulido; Antonio Gasparrini; Christopher S Saigal; Benjamin P Horton; J Richard Landis; Rodger Madison; Ron Keren
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.