Literature DB >> 26989837

Effects of State Cervical Cancer Insurance Mandates on Pap Test Rates.

Marianne P Bitler1, Christopher S Carpenter2,3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of state insurance mandates requiring insurance plans to cover Pap tests, the standard screening for cervical cancer that is recommended for nearly all adult women. DATA SOURCES: Individual-level data on 600,000 women age 19-64 from the CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. STUDY
DESIGN: Twenty-four states adopted state mandates requiring private insurers in the state to cover Pap tests from 1988 to 2000. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis comparing within-state changes in Pap test rates before and after adoption of a mandate, controlling for the associated changes in other states that did not adopt a mandate. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Difference-in-differences estimates indicated that the Pap test mandates significantly increased past 2-year cervical cancer screenings by 1.3 percentage points, with larger effects for Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. These effects are plausibly concentrated among insured women.
CONCLUSIONS: Mandating more generous insurance coverage for even inexpensive, routine services with already high utilization rates such as Pap tests can significantly further increase utilization. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Insurance mandates; Pap tests; cervical cancer; difference-in-differences

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26989837      PMCID: PMC5264101          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  27 in total

1.  Laws requiring health plans to provide direct access to obstetricians and gynecologists, and use of cancer screening by women.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Jia Chan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The health insurance picture in 1990.

Authors:  C B Sullivan; T Rice
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Accuracy of self-reports of Pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle Howard; Gina Agarwal; Alice Lytwyn
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Trends In Health Insurance Enrollment, 2013-15.

Authors:  Katherine G Carman; Christine Eibner; Susan M Paddock
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Impacts of the Affordable Care Act dependent coverage provision on health-related outcomes of young adults.

Authors:  Silvia Barbaresco; Charles J Courtemanche; Yanling Qi
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  The Impact of Near-Universal Insurance Coverage on Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Evidence from Massachusetts.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  State trends in health risk factors and receipt of clinical preventive services among US adults during the 1990s.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Shayne Bland; Eve Powell-Griner; Richard Klein; Henry E Wells; Gary Hogelin; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Preventive care: do we practice what we preach?

Authors:  N Lurie; W G Manning; C Peterson; G A Goldberg; C A Phelps; L Lillard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Preventive care: female cancer screening, 1996-2000.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Curtis S Florence; Kenneth E Thorpe; Edmund R Becker; Peter J Joski
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  The Impact of Health Care Reform on Hospital and Preventive Care: Evidence from Massachusetts(☆).

Authors:  Jonathan T Kolstad; Amanda E Kowalski
Journal:  J Public Econ       Date:  2012-08-16
View more
  6 in total

1.  Effectiveness of antimalarial interventions in Nigeria: Evidence from facility-level longitudinal data.

Authors:  Nopphol Witvorapong; Kolo Yaro Yakubu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Lessons from state mandates of preventive cancer screenings.

Authors:  Wendy Yi Xu; Bryan Dowd; Jean Abraham
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Medicaid Expansions and Cervical Cancer Screening for Low-Income Women.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Wafa W Tarazi; Stephanie Hochhalter; Bassam Dahman; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Non-utilization of the Pap Test Among Women with Frequent Health System Contact.

Authors:  Abayomi N Ogunwale; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Jane Montealegre; Yiwen Cui; Maria Jibaja-Weiss; Matthew L Anderson
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2016-12

5.  Influence of dental insurance coverage on access to preventive periodontal care in middle-aged and elderly populations: analysis of representative Korean Community Health Survey Data (2011-2015).

Authors:  Young-Eun Jang; Chun-Bae Kim; Nam-Hee Kim
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Government regulation of private health insurance.

Authors:  Nkengafac Villyen Motaze; Primus Che Chi; Pierre Ongolo-Zogo; Jean Serge Ndongo; Charles S Wiysonge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.