BACKGROUND:Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is still a major long-term complication of modern cataract surgery. We evaluated the impact of sharp-edged intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different haptic designs made from the same hydrophobic acrylic material on posterior and anterior lens capsule opacification. SETTING:Eye clinic of Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania. Prospective randomised clinical study. METHODS:Seventy-four eyes of 74 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were included in a prospective randomised clinical study. Thirty-seven eyes of 37 patients received athree-piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, MA3OBA, Alcon) IOL; and thirty-seven eyes of 37 patients received aone-piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, SA3OAL, Alcon) IOL. Visual acuity, anterior capsule opacification (ACO), capsular folds, capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) were evaluated. ACO was assessed subjectively. PCO values in the entire IOL optic area and in the central 3 mm optic zone were assessed using a photographic image-analysis system (EPCO2000). Follow-ups were performed postoperatively at 1 day, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in best corrected visual acuity, grade of ACO and capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping between IOL types during the follow-up period. Patients in the one-piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group more frequently presented with capsular folds behind the IOL optic area than those in the three-piece IOL group. In the three-piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group, PCO values (mean (SD)) of the entire IOL optic area were significantly lower six months postoperative (three-piece: 0.002 (0.009); one-piece: 0.007 (0.017); p=0.04), one year postoperative (three-piece: 0.004 (0.016); one-piece: 0.026 (0.041); p=0.001) as well as one year postoperative in the central 3 mm optic zone (three-piece: 0.000 (0.0002); one-piece: 0.019 (0.049); p=0.001). However, two years postoperative, the PCO values of the groups did not show significant differences (entire IOL optic area: three-piece, 0.136 (0.223); one-piece, 0.154 (0.190); p=0.18; central zone: three-piece, 0.023 (0.065); one-piece: 0.020 (0.039); p=0.44). CONCLUSION: The 2 year follow-up after cataract surgery showed no significant difference in ACO and PCO development between three-piece and one-piece acrylic hydrophobic intraocular lenses.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is still a major long-term complication of modern cataract surgery. We evaluated the impact of sharp-edged intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different haptic designs made from the same hydrophobic acrylic material on posterior and anterior lens capsule opacification. SETTING: Eye clinic of Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania. Prospective randomised clinical study. METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 74 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were included in a prospective randomised clinical study. Thirty-seven eyes of 37 patients received a three-piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, MA3OBA, Alcon) IOL; and thirty-seven eyes of 37 patients received a one-piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, SA3OAL, Alcon) IOL. Visual acuity, anterior capsule opacification (ACO), capsular folds, capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) were evaluated. ACO was assessed subjectively. PCO values in the entire IOL optic area and in the central 3 mm optic zone were assessed using a photographic image-analysis system (EPCO2000). Follow-ups were performed postoperatively at 1 day, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in best corrected visual acuity, grade of ACO and capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping between IOL types during the follow-up period. Patients in the one-piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group more frequently presented with capsular folds behind the IOL optic area than those in the three-piece IOL group. In the three-piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group, PCO values (mean (SD)) of the entire IOL optic area were significantly lower six months postoperative (three-piece: 0.002 (0.009); one-piece: 0.007 (0.017); p=0.04), one year postoperative (three-piece: 0.004 (0.016); one-piece: 0.026 (0.041); p=0.001) as well as one year postoperative in the central 3 mm optic zone (three-piece: 0.000 (0.0002); one-piece: 0.019 (0.049); p=0.001). However, two years postoperative, the PCO values of the groups did not show significant differences (entire IOL optic area: three-piece, 0.136 (0.223); one-piece, 0.154 (0.190); p=0.18; central zone: three-piece, 0.023 (0.065); one-piece: 0.020 (0.039); p=0.44). CONCLUSION: The 2 year follow-up after cataract surgery showed no significant difference in ACO and PCO development between three-piece and one-piece acrylic hydrophobic intraocular lenses.
Authors: Lloyd E Bender; Christoph Nimsgern; Romina Jose; Hari Jayaram; David J Spalton; Manfred R Tetz; Richard B Packard; William Meacock; James Boyce Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: P G Ursell; D J Spalton; M V Pande; E J Hollick; S Barman; J Boyce; K Tilling Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: D J Apple; K D Solomon; M R Tetz; E I Assia; E Y Holland; U F Legler; J C Tsai; V E Castaneda; J P Hoggatt; A M Kostick Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 1992 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Luis G Vargas; Marcela Escobar-Gomez; David J Apple; Daphne S Hoddinott; Josef M Schmidbauer Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Thomas Kohnen; Martin Baumeister; Daniel Kook; Oliver K Klaproth; Christian Ohrloff Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Sun Young Kim; Young Kwon Chung; Hye Young Shin; Mee Yon Lee; Young-Chun Lee; Su-Young Kim Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.889