Literature DB >> 17123520

Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement.

M Cristina Magli1, Luca Gianaroli, Anna Pia Ferraretti, Michela Lappi, Alessandra Ruberti, Valeria Farfalli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze embryo morphology in relation to the corresponding chromosomal status, in order to evaluate the effects of aneuploidy over fragmentation, delayed cleavage, and arrested cleavage.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Reproductive Medicine Unit, Società Italiana di Studi di Medicina della Riproduzione, Bologna, Italy. PATIENT(S): A total of 662 patients with a poor prognosis for pregnancy underwent 916 cycles of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy. INTERVENTION(S): The chromosomes XY, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, and 22 were analyzed in blastomeres biopsied from day 3 embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Embryo morphology, chromosomal status of the analyzed blastomeres, and spreading and reanalysis of nontransferred embryos. RESULT(S): The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher in arrested or slow-cleaving embryos, and in embryos cleaving too fast, compared to embryos with eight cells at 62 hours after insemination. The presence of an uneven number of blastomeres or fragments scattered in the perivitelline space was associated with an increased incidence of chromosomal abnormalities. CONCLUSION(S): A correlation between embryo development and chromosomal complement makes the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities significantly higher in embryos dividing according to a time frame and a symmetry plan which are different from what are expected. The type of fragmentation is also related to chromosomal status, which explains why the extrusion of fragments might severely affect embryo viability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17123520     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  49 in total

1.  Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day?

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Jihoon Kim; John D Biggers
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  A greater number of euploid blastocysts in a given cohort predicts excellent outcomes in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Scott Morin; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David McCulloh; Jamie Grifo; Santiago Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Is the presence of a non-cleaved embryo on day 3 associated with poorer quality of the remaining embryos in the cohort?

Authors:  Ronit Machtinger; Charles L Bormann; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Early compaction at day 3 may be a useful additional criterion for embryo transfer.

Authors:  Sébastien Le Cruguel; Véronique Ferré-L'Hôtellier; Catherine Morinière; Sophie Lemerle; Pascal Reynier; Philippe Descamps; Pascale May-Panloup
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Live birth rate and number of blastomeres on day 2 transfer.

Authors:  Antonino Azzarello; Thomas Hoest; Anders Hay-Schmidt; Anne Lis Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology.

Authors:  Ange Wang; Jonathan Kort; Barry Behr; Lynn M Westphal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Predicting aneuploidy in human oocytes: key factors which affect the meiotic process.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; G Cavallini; A Crippa; A Capoti; S Resta; F Robles; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol.

Authors:  D S Johnson; G Gemelos; J Baner; A Ryan; C Cinnioglu; M Banjevic; R Ross; M Alper; B Barrett; J Frederick; D Potter; B Behr; M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.