Literature DB >> 17122227

Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients: a clinical trial.

Giuseppe Natalini1, Antonio Rosano, Maria Taranto, Barbara Faggian, Elena Vittorielli, Achille Bernardini.   

Abstract

In the present study, we compared indices of respiratory-induced variation obtained from direct arterial blood pressure measurement with analogous indices obtained from the plethysmogram measured by the pulse oximeter to assess the value of these indices for predicting the cardiac output increase in response to a fluid challenge. Thirty-two fluid challenges were performed in 22 hypotensive patients who were also monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter. Hemodynamic and plethysmographic data were collected before and after intravascular volume expansion. Patients were classified as nonresponders if their cardiac index did not increase by 15% from baseline. Nonresponding patients had both lower arterial pulse variation ([10 +/- 4]% vs [19 +/- 13]%, P = 0.020) and lower plethysmographic pulse variation ([12 +/- 7]% vs [21 +/- 14]%, P = 0.034) when compared with responders. Fluid responsiveness was similarly predicted by arterial and plethysmographic pulse variations (area under ROC curve 0.74 vs 0.72, respectively, P = 0.90) and by arterial and plethysmographic systolic variation (area under ROC curve 0.64 vs 0.72, respectively, P = 0.50). Nonresponders were identified by changes in pulse variation both on arterial and plethysmographic waveform (area under ROC curve 0.80 vs 0.87, respectively, P = 0.40) and by changes in arterial and plethysmographic systolic variations (area under ROC curve 0.84 vs 0.80, respectively, P = 0.76). In the population studied, plethysmographic dynamic indices of respiratory-induced variation were just as useful for predicting fluid responsiveness as the analogous indices derived from direct arterial blood pressure measurement. These plethysmographic indices could provide a noninvasive tool for predicting the cardiac output increase by administering fluid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17122227     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000246811.88524.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  30 in total

1.  Pulse oximeter plethysmograph variation and its relationship to the arterial waveform in mechanically ventilated children.

Authors:  J R Chandler; E Cooke; C Petersen; W Karlen; N Froese; J Lim; J M Ansermino
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Fabio Cavallaro; Cristina Marano; Chiara Falcone; Paolo De Santis; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Comment on "Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients" by Feissel et al.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Olivier Desebbe; Jean-Jacques Lehot
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Photoplethysmographic characterization of vascular tone mediated changes in arterial pressure: an observational study.

Authors:  Gerardo Tusman; Cecilia M Acosta; Sven Pulletz; Stephan H Böhm; Adriana Scandurra; Jorge Martinez Arca; Matías Madorno; Fernando Suarez Sipmann
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Using what you get: dynamic physiologic signatures of critical illness.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Gilles Clermont
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Arterial Pressure Variation in Elective Noncardiac Surgery: Identifying Reference Distributions and Modifying Factors.

Authors:  Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Pleth variability index-directed fluid management in abdominal surgery under combined general and epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  Yinan Yu; Jing Dong; Zifeng Xu; Hao Shen; Jijian Zheng
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Pulse pressure variation and volume responsiveness during acutely increased pulmonary artery pressure: an experimental study.

Authors:  Fritz Daudel; David Tüller; Stefanie Krähenbühl; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients.

Authors:  Marc Feissel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Paolo Merlani; Julio Badie; Jean-Pierre Faller; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.