Literature DB >> 17120712

Does energy expenditure affect the perception of egocentric distance? A failure to replicate experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003).

Jeffrey J Hutchison1, Jack M Loomis.   

Abstract

In a series of recent studies, Proffitt and his colleagues have reported that the perceived distance to a target is influenced by the energy expenditure associated with any action, such as walking or throwing, for spanning the distance to the target. In particular, Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003) reported that wearing a heavy backpack caused verbal reports of distance to increase. We conducted a study to determine whether three responses dependent on perceived distance (verbal report of distance, blind walking, and estimates of object size) are influenced by the backpack manipulation. In two experiments, one involving a between-participants design and the other involving a within-participants design, we found that none of the three responses were influenced by the wearing of a heavy backpack.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17120712     DOI: 10.1017/s1138741600006235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Span J Psychol        ISSN: 1138-7416            Impact factor:   1.264


  16 in total

1.  What a car does to your perception: Distance evaluations differ from within and outside of a car.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Hartmut Zoppke; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

2.  Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Jodie A Baird; Mark Greenburg; Robert Russell; Kevin Shaughnessy; Scott Waymouth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

Review 3.  Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine top-down effects on perception.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  The social psychology of perception experiments: hills, backpacks, glucose, and the problem of generalizability.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Brennan Klein; Ariana Spiegel; Cassandra J Strawser; Morgan Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Influencing choices with conversational primes: How a magic trick unconsciously influences card choices.

Authors:  Alice Pailhès; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Aging and the perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; George J Andersen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-12-31

7.  Measurement of instantaneous perceived self-motion using continuous pointing.

Authors:  Joshua H Siegle; Jennifer L Campos; Betty J Mohler; Jack M Loomis; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The various perceptions of distance: an alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Jerome V Danoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual field dependence as a navigational strategy.

Authors:  Chéla R Willey; Russell E Jackson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Motor simulation in tool-use effect on distance estimation: A replication of Witt and Proffitt (2008).

Authors:  Lisa Molto; Nicolas Morgado; Eric Guinet; Laurina Fazioli; Loïc P Heurley; Richard Palluel-Germain
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.