Literature DB >> 23276215

Aging and the perception of egocentric distance.

Zheng Bian1, George J Andersen.   

Abstract

The present study examined whether there is an age-related difference in judging egocentric distances. In 4 experiments, both younger and older observers judged the physical distance of an object on a ground plane and reported their judgments by verbal report and by blind rope pulling. Overall, we found that (a) younger observers in general underestimated egocentric distance and showed foreshortening; (b) older observers judged more egocentric distance than younger observers and did not show foreshortening; and (c) this age-related difference was not due to an age-related difference in scaling or output calibration (Experiment 2), the use of eye height information (Experiment 3), or the use of texture gradient information (Experiment 4). These results may be accounted for by differences in perceived slant of the ground surface or a greater reliance on pictorial cues with increased age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23276215      PMCID: PMC3778099          DOI: 10.1037/a0030991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  54 in total

1.  Sequential priming of 3-D perceptual organization.

Authors:  J S McCarley; Z J He
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

2.  Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon.

Authors:  T L Ooi; B Wu; Z J He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Aging and the perception of depth and 3-D shape from motion parallax.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Anna Marie Clayton; Cassandra F Shular; Sarah R Thompson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-09

4.  The ground dominance effect in the perception of 3-D layout.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; Myron L Braunstein; George J Andersen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-07

5.  Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance.

Authors:  M J Sinai; T L Ooi; Z J He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions.

Authors:  J W Philbeck; J M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Continuous visual information may be important after all: a failure to replicate Thomson (1983).

Authors:  D Elliott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual localization: age and practice.

Authors:  R Sekuler; K Ball
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  The role of suggested size in distance responses.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-08
View more
  15 in total

1.  The Effects of Age and Set Size on the Fast Extraction of Egocentric Distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-01-22

2.  Gaze behavior and the perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Age-related similarities and differences in monitoring spatial cognition.

Authors:  Robert Ariel; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Angular scale expansion theory and the misperception of egocentric distance in locomotor space.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Psychol Neurosci       Date:  2014

5.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Action-specific influences on perception and postperceptual processes: Present controversies and future directions.

Authors:  John W Philbeck; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  Discovering your inner Gibson: reconciling action-specific and ecological approaches to perception-action.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

Review 8.  Ageing vision and falls: a review.

Authors:  Liana Nafisa Saftari; Oh-Sang Kwon
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 9.  The Aging Navigational System.

Authors:  Adam W Lester; Scott D Moffat; Jan M Wiener; Carol A Barnes; Thomas Wolbers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?

Authors:  Abigail M Dean; Jaehyun Oh; Christopher J Thomson; Catherine J Norris; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.