Literature DB >> 19815806

Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack.

Frank H Durgin1, Jodie A Baird, Mark Greenburg, Robert Russell, Kevin Shaughnessy, Scott Waymouth.   

Abstract

A growing literature argues that wearing a heavy backpack makes slopes look steeper and distances seem longer (e.g., Proffitt, 2006). To test for effects of experimental demand characteristics in a backpack experiment, we manipulated the experimental demand of the backpack and then used a postexperiment questionnaire to assess participants' beliefs about the purpose of the backpack. For participants in the low-demand condition, an elaborate deception was used to provide an alternative explanation of the requirement to wear a heavy backpack (i.e., that it held EMG equipment). The highest slope judgments were found for those undeceived participants who guessed that the backpack was intended to affect their slope perception and also reported that they thought they were affected by it. When persuaded that the backpack served another purpose, participants' slope estimates were no different from those of participants not wearing a backpack. These findings suggest that backpack effects, and other reported effects of effort on perception, are judgmental biases that result from the social, not physical, demands of the experimental context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815806     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception.

Authors:  M Bhalla; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action.

Authors:  Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

3.  Does energy expenditure affect the perception of egocentric distance? A failure to replicate experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003).

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hutchison; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Span J Psychol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.264

4.  Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.

Authors:  S SCHACHTER; J E SINGER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Cognitive dissonance and the perception of natural environments.

Authors:  Emily Balcetis; David Dunning
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-10

6.  Development of size constancy in children: a test of the metacognitive theory.

Authors:  Carl E Granrud
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Attention and awareness in stage magic: turning tricks into research.

Authors:  Stephen L Macknik; Mac King; James Randi; Apollo Robbins; John Thompson; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Skating down a steeper slope: fear influences the perception of geographical slant.

Authors:  Jeanine K Stefanucci; Dennis R Proffitt; Gerald L Clore; Nazish Parekh
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.

Authors:  E F Loftus; D G Miller; H J Burns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1978-01
View more
  61 in total

1.  What a car does to your perception: Distance evaluations differ from within and outside of a car.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Hartmut Zoppke; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

2.  Perceptually walking in another's shoes: goals and memories constrain spatial perception.

Authors:  David W Vinson; J Scott Jordan; Alycia M Hund
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-10-08

3.  Multimodally specified energy expenditure and action-based distance judgments.

Authors:  Eliah White; Kevin Shockley; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

4.  Impact of planned movement direction on judgments of visual locations.

Authors:  Wladimir Kirsch; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-22

5.  Does perceived angular declination contribute to perceived optical slant on level ground?

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Attentional focus, perceived target size, and movement kinematics under performance pressure.

Authors:  Rob Gray; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

7.  Affordances matter in geographical slant perception.

Authors:  Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

8.  Catching ease influences perceived speed: evidence for action-specific effects from action-based measures.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Mila Sugovic
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

9.  Can you experience 'top-down' effects on perception?: The case of race categories and perceived lightness.

Authors:  Chaz Firestone; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

10.  Within reach but not so reachable: obstacles matter in visual perception of distances.

Authors:  Nicolas Morgado; Edouard Gentaz; Eric Guinet; François Osiurak; Richard Palluel-Germain
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.