Literature DB >> 32661142

Influencing choices with conversational primes: How a magic trick unconsciously influences card choices.

Alice Pailhès1, Gustav Kuhn2.   

Abstract

Past research demonstrates that unconscious primes can affect people's decisions. However, these free choice priming paradigms present participants with very few alternatives. Magicians' forcing techniques provide a powerful tool to investigate how natural implicit primes can unconsciously influence decisions with multiple alternatives. We used video and live performances of the mental priming force. This technique uses subtle nonverbal and verbal conversational primes to influence spectators to choose the three of diamonds. Our results show that a large number of participants chose the target card while reporting feeling free and in control of their choice. Even when they were influenced by the primes, participants typically failed to give the reason for their choice. These results show that naturally embedding primes within a person's speech and gestures effectively influenced people's decision making. This raises the possibility that this form of mind control could be used to effectively manipulate other mental processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; influence; magic trick; priming

Year:  2020        PMID: 32661142      PMCID: PMC7395500          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2000682117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Attention without awareness in blindsight.

Authors:  R W Kentridge; C A Heywood; L Weiskrantz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases.

Authors:  Jamie DeCoster; Heather M Claypool
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2004

3.  How something can be said about telling more than we can know: on choice blindness and introspection.

Authors:  Petter Johansson; Lars Hall; Sverker Sikström; Betty Tärning; Andreas Lind
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2006-10-17

Review 4.  Towards a science of magic.

Authors:  Gustav Kuhn; Alym A Amlani; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The gestural misinformation effect: skewing eyewitness testimony through gesture.

Authors:  Daniel J Gurney; Karen J Pine; Richard Wiseman
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2013

6.  Iconic gestures prime words.

Authors:  De-Fu Yap; Wing-Chee So; Ju-Min Melvin Yap; Ying-Quan Tan; Ruo-Li Serene Teoh
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-10-12

Review 7.  Unconscious influences on decision making: a critical review.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; David R Shanks
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 12.579

8.  Are depictive gestures like pictures? commonalities and differences in semantic processing.

Authors:  Ying Choon Wu; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will.

Authors:  Alice Pailhès; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-14

10.  A framework for using magic to study the mind.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Who's fooling whom in the science of magic?

Authors:  Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.