Literature DB >> 7860835

Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility.

R Drullman1.   

Abstract

This paper describes a number of listening experiments to investigate the relative contribution of temporal envelope modulations and fine structure to speech intelligibility. The amplitude envelopes of 24 1/4-oct bands (covering 100-6400 Hz) were processed in several ways (e.g., fast compression) in order to assess the importance of the modulation peaks and troughs. Results for 60 normal-hearing subjects show that reduction of modulations by the addition of noise is more detrimental to sentence intelligibility than the same degree of reduction achieved by direct manipulation of the envelope; in some cases the benefit in speech-reception threshold (SRT) is almost 7 dB. Two crossover levels can be defined in dividing the temporal envelope into two equally important parts. The first crossover level divides the envelope into two perceptually equal parts: Removing modulations either chi dB below or above that level yields the same intelligibility score. The second crossover level divides the envelope into two acoustically equal peak and trough parts. The perceptual level is 9-12 dB higher than the acoustic level, indicating that envelope peaks are perceptually more important than troughs. Further results showed that 24 intact temporal speech envelopes with noise fine structure retain perfect intelligibility. In general, for the present type of signal manipulations, no one-to-one relation between the modulation-transfer function and the intelligibility scores could be established.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7860835     DOI: 10.1121/1.413112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  68 in total

Review 1.  Some behavioral and neurobiological constraints on theories of audiovisual speech integration: a review and suggestions for new directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; David B Pisoni; James T Townsend
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Forward masking in the amplitude-modulation domain for tone carriers: psychophysical results and physiological correlates.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Paul C Nelson; Neal F Viemeister; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-23

5.  Modulation power and phase spectrum of natural sounds enhance neural encoding performed by single auditory neurons.

Authors:  Anne Hsu; Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Transformation of temporal properties between auditory midbrain and cortex in the awake Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  Maria Ter-Mikaelian; Dan H Sanes; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Neuronal oscillations and visual amplification of speech.

Authors:  Charles E Schroeder; Peter Lakatos; Yoshinao Kajikawa; Sarah Partan; Aina Puce
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Influence of the interstimulus interval on temporal processing and learning: testing the state-dependent network model.

Authors:  Dean V Buonomano; Jennifer Bramen; Mahsa Khodadadifar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity as a Mechanism for Sensory Timing.

Authors:  Helen Motanis; Michael J Seay; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.