Literature DB >> 18211875

Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change.

Marcel E Visser1.   

Abstract

The pivotal question in the debate on the ecological effects of climate change is whether species will be able to adapt fast enough to keep up with their changing environment. If we establish the maximal rate of adaptation, this will set an upper limit to the rate at which temperatures can increase without loss of biodiversity. The rate of adaptation will primarily be set by the rate of microevolution since (i) phenotypic plasticity alone is not sufficient as reaction norms will no longer be adaptive and hence microevolution on the reaction norm is needed, (ii) learning will be favourable to the individual but cannot be passed on to the next generations, (iii) maternal effects may play a role but, as with other forms of phenotypic plasticity, the response of offspring to the maternal cues will no longer be adaptive in a changing environment, and (iv) adaptation via immigration of individuals with genotypes adapted to warmer environments also involves microevolution as these genotypes are better adapted in terms of temperature, but not in terms of, for instance, photoperiod.Long-term studies on wild populations with individually known animals play an essential role in detecting and understanding the temporal trends in life-history traits, and to estimate the heritability of, and selection pressures on, life-history traits. However, additional measurements on other trophic levels and on the mechanisms underlying phenotypic plasticity are needed to predict the rate of microevolution, especially under changing conditions. Using this knowledge on heritability of, and selection on, life-history traits, in combination with climate scenarios, we will be able to predict the rate of adaptation for different climate scenarios. The final step is to use ecoevolutionary dynamical models to make the link to population viability and from there to biodiversity loss for those scenarios where the rate of adaptation is insufficient.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211875      PMCID: PMC2409451          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  51 in total

1.  Lack of response to artificial selection on the slope of reaction norms for seasonal polyphenism in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  P J Wijngaarden; P M Brakefield
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Climate change hastens population extinctions.

Authors:  John F McLaughlin; Jessica J Hellmann; Carol L Boggs; Paul R Ehrlich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird.

Authors:  C Both; M E Visser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Climate, changing phenology, and other life history traits: nonlinearity and match-mismatch to the environment.

Authors:  Nils Chr Stenseth; Atle Mysterud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change.

Authors:  Denis Réale; Andrew G McAdam; Stan Boutin; Dominique Berteaux
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.

Authors:  Camille Parmesan; Gary Yohe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Large-scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier.

Authors:  Christiaan Both; Aleksandr V Artemyev; Bert Blaauw; Richard J Cowie; Aarnoud J Dekhuijzen; Tapio Eeva; Anders Enemar; Lars Gustafsson; Elena V Ivankina; Antero Järvinen; Neil B Metcalfe; N Erik I Nyholm; Jaime Potti; Pierre-Alain Ravussin; Juan Jose Sanz; Bengt Silverin; Fred M Slater; Leonid V Sokolov; János Török; Wolfgang Winkel; Jonathan Wright; Herwig Zang; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail?

Authors:  Jon R Bridle; Timothy H Vines
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds.

Authors:  T Price; M Kirkpatrick; S J Arnold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The costs of egg production and incubation in great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  M E Visser; C M Lessells
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  191 in total

1.  Heritable circadian period length in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Barbara Helm; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Disentangling the paradox of insect phenology: are temporal trends reflecting the response to warming?

Authors:  Elizabeth R Ellwood; Jeffrey M Diez; Inés Ibáñez; Richard B Primack; Hiromi Kobori; Hiroyoshi Higuchi; John A Silander
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Phenology, seasonal timing and circannual rhythms: towards a unified framework.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Samuel P Caro; Kees van Oers; Sonja V Schaper; Barbara Helm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jessica Forrest; Abraham J Miller-Rushing
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The importance of phylogeny to the study of phenological response to global climate change.

Authors:  Charles C Davis; Charles G Willis; Richard B Primack; Abraham J Miller-Rushing
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Climate change: Fatter marmots on the rise.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Phenotypic plasticity and population viability: the importance of environmental predictability.

Authors:  Thomas E Reed; Robin S Waples; Daniel E Schindler; Jeffrey J Hard; Michael T Kinnison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels.

Authors:  Wim H Van der Putten; Mirka Macel; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Tolerance adaptation and precipitation changes complicate latitudinal patterns of climate change impacts.

Authors:  Timothy C Bonebrake; Michael D Mastrandrea
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Demographic models and IPCC climate projections predict the decline of an emperor penguin population.

Authors:  Stéphanie Jenouvrier; Hal Caswell; Christophe Barbraud; Marika Holland; Julienne Stroeve; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.