Literature DB >> 17108095

Cortical response to auditory motion suggests an asymmetry in the reliance on inter-hemispheric connections between the left and right auditory cortices.

Katrin Krumbholz1, Nicola Hewson-Stoate, Marc Schönwiesner.   

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to measure the brain's response to auditory motion using electroencephalography (EEG) to gain insight into the mechanisms by which hemispheric lateralization for auditory spatial processing is established in the human brain. The onset of left- or rightward motion in an otherwise continuous sound was found to elicit a large response, which appeared to arise from higher-level nonprimary auditory areas. This motion onset response was strongly lateralized to the hemisphere contralateral to the direction of motion. The response latencies suggest that the ipsilateral response to the leftward motion was produced by indirect callosal projections from the opposite hemisphere, whereas the ipsilateral response to the rightward motion seemed to receive contributions from direct thalamocortical projections. These results suggest an asymmetry in the reliance on inter-hemispheric projections between the left and right auditory cortices for auditory spatial processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17108095     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00560.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  29 in total

1.  Motion-onset auditory-evoked potentials critically depend on history.

Authors:  Ramona Grzeschik; Martin Böckmann-Barthel; Roland Mühler; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interhemisphere asymmetry of auditory evoked potentials in humans and mismatch negativity during sound source localization.

Authors:  S F Vaitulevich; L B Shestopalova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-12

3.  Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Esther A Nobis; Robert J Weatheritt; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Widespread and Opponent fMRI Signals Represent Sound Location in Macaque Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Michael Ortiz-Rios; Frederico A C Azevedo; Paweł Kuśmierek; Dávid Z Balla; Matthias H Munk; Georgios A Keliris; Nikos K Logothetis; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Auditory temporal edge detection in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans.

Authors:  Mikaella Sarrou; Pia Marlena Schmitz; Nicole Hamm; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory spatial attention representations in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Lingqiang Kong; Samantha W Michalka; Maya L Rosen; Summer L Sheremata; Jascha D Swisher; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; David C Somers
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Evoked and intrinsic asymmetries during auditory attention: implications for the contralateral and neglect models of functioning.

Authors:  Terri M Teshiba; Josef Ling; David A Ruhl; Bronwyn S Bedrick; Amanda Peña; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans.

Authors:  Paul M Briley; Pádraig T Kitterick; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-23

10.  A population rate code of auditory space in the human cortex.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Patrick J C May; Paavo Alku; Hannu Tiitinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.