Literature DB >> 17107767

Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Sébastien Santurette1, Torsten Dau.   

Abstract

The effects of hearing impairment on the perception of binaural-pitch stimuli were investigated. Several experiments were performed with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners, including detection and discrimination of binaural pitch, and melody recognition using different types of binaural pitches. For the normal-hearing listeners, all types of binaural pitches could be perceived immediately and were musical. The hearing-impaired listeners could be divided into three groups based on their results: (a) some perceived all types of binaural pitches, but with decreased salience or musicality compared to normal-hearing listeners; (b) some could only perceive the strongest pitch types; (c) some were unable to perceive any binaural pitch at all. The performance of the listeners was not correlated with audibility. Additional experiments investigated the correlation between performance in binaural-pitch perception and performance in measures of spectral and temporal resolution. Reduced frequency discrimination appeared to be linked to poorer melody recognition skills. Reduced frequency selectivity was also found to impede the perception of binaural-pitch stimuli. Overall, binaural-pitch stimuli might be very useful tools within clinical diagnostics for detecting specific deficiencies in the auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17107767     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

3.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

4.  Detection and identification of monaural and binaural pitch contours in dyslexic listeners.

Authors:  Sébastien Santurette; Hanne Poelmans; Heleen Luts; Pol Ghesquiére; Jan Wouters; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-07

5.  Envelope coding in auditory nerve fibers following noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-16

6.  Frequency discrimination duration effects for Huggins pitch and narrowband noise (L).

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Martine Turgeon; Stuart Lancaster; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

Review 8.  The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15

9.  Influence of implantable hearing aids and neuroprosthesison music perception.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Lars Böhme; Gerrit Götze
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-03

10.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.