Literature DB >> 34043124

Unveiling the histopathologic spectrum of MRI-guided breast biopsies: an institutional pathological-radiological correlation.

Gustavo Moreno1, Mariel Molina1, Ruizhe Wu2, Julie R Sullivan3, Julie M Jorns4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity but suffers from low specificity, resulting in many benign breast biopsies for MRI-detected lesions. We sought to compare histologic findings between patients who underwent MRI-guided breast biopsy versus biopsy via other imaging modalities as well as to examine features associated with malignancy in the MRI cohort to help inform MRI-biopsy practice.
METHODS: A 2-year (2018-2019) retrospective review of breast biopsies at our enterprise was conducted. Biopsies were categorized as stereotactic, ultrasound, MRI, or palpation guided. Pathology was categorized as benign (further divided into nine categories), atypical, or malignant (subdivided into in situ and invasive carcinoma). Pathology was compared between biopsy groups. Clinical, pathologic, and imaging features were compared between pathology groups within the MRI cohort.
RESULTS: 5828 biopsies from 4154 patients were reviewed, including 548 MRI-guided biopsies with stratification of MRI-biopsy pathology as follows: 69% benign, 13.8% atypical, and 17.2% malignant. Among benign MRI biopsies, there was higher frequency of "clustered cysts with papillary apocrine metaplasia" (56/548; 10.2%) and lower rate of fibroadenoma/fibroadenomatous change (55/548; 10%) compared to other modalities (158 or 3% and 1144 or 21.7% of 5280 biopsies, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed indication of breast cancer (p < .0001), ipsilateral cancer (p < .0001) and rapid initial phase kinetics (p = .017) to remain significantly associated with malignant MRI-biopsy pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: A concurrent or recent breast cancer diagnosis was most predictive of malignancy on MRI-guided breast biopsy. Combined MRI feature evaluation and radiologic-pathologic concordance activities may allow for prognostic refinement and improved risk stratification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Correlation; MRI; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pathology; Radiology

Year:  2021        PMID: 34043124     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06251-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  20 in total

1.  Outcome analysis of 9-gauge MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle breast biopsies.

Authors:  Gaiane M Rauch; Basak E Dogan; Taletha B Smith; Ping Liu; Wei T Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Contemporary breast imaging and concordance assessment: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Jared H Linebarger
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Nicky H G M Peters; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Willem P T M Mali; Karel G M Moons; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging: the evolution of breast imaging.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Astrid Hacker; Stefan Sedlacek
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 5.  Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Spick; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The utility of breast MRI in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Paige Teller; Valerie J Jefford; Sheryl G A Gabram; Mary Newell; Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  MRI-guided breast needle core biopsies: pathologic features of newly diagnosed malignancies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Manion; Jane E Brock; Sughra Raza; Emily S Reisenbichler
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR.

Authors:  Debra L Monticciolo; Mary S Newell; Linda Moy; Bethany Niell; Barbara Monsees; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Abe; Robert A Schmidt; Rajshri N Shah; Akiko Shimauchi; Kirti Kulkarni; Charlene A Sennett; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Improving Patient Care by Incorporation of Multidisciplinary Breast Radiology-Pathology Correlation Conference.

Authors:  Seema Prakash; Shambhavi Venkataraman; Priscilla J Slanetz; Vandana Dialani; Valerie Fein-Zachary; Nancy Littlehale; Tejas S Mehta
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.248

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.