Literature DB >> 1709306

Unsuspected Chlamydia trachomatis infection in heterosexual men attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic: evaluation of risk factors and screening methods.

C A Rietmeijer1, F N Judson, M B Van Hensbroek, J M Ehret, J M Douglas.   

Abstract

To characterize the problem of unsuspected Chlamydia trachomatis infection in heterosexual men attending a sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic, the authors assessed risk factors for infection and the value of screening for infection by gram-stained smears and urinalysis in 438 men who did not have conventional clinical indications for chlamydial treatment at their initial visit. Evaluations included urethral swabs for gram-stained smears and Neisseria gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis cultures and microscopy of first-catch urine sediment. C. trachomatis was isolated from 29 subjects (6.6%) and N. gonorrhoeae from 6 subjects (1.3%), (P less than .05). The only demographic or clinical factors that were associated with C. trachomatis were age younger than 21 years and five or more lifetime sexual partners. Screening for C. trachomatis with urethral gram stain and urine sediment examination had sensitivities of only 23% and 35%, respectively. Risk factor assessment and screening with standard microscopic procedures do not adequately predict infection in this group, which accounts for almost 25% of the C. trachomatis burden in heterosexual men who visit an STD clinic. More specific chlamydia detection methods are needed for effective control programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1709306     DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199101000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of risk factors for four sexually transmitted infections: results from a study of attenders at three genitourinary medicine clinics in England.

Authors:  G Hughes; M Catchpole; P A Rogers; A R Brady; G Kinghorn; D Mercey; N Thin
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 2.  [Urogenital chlamydial infections in women and men].

Authors:  A Clad; W Krause
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Screening associated with reduced infection rates.

Authors:  T Crowley; P Horner; J Nelki; E O Caul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-03-12

Review 4.  Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescents and adults. Clinical and economic implications.

Authors:  C A Marra; D M Patrick; R Reynolds; F Marra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine of asymptomatic men.

Authors:  J W Sanders; E W Hook; L E Welsh; M E Shepherd; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Development and evaluation of screening strategies for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in an STD clinic.

Authors:  Y T van Duynhoven; M J van de Laar; J S Fennema; G J van Doornum; J A van den Hoek
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1995-12

8.  Asymptomatic gonorrhoea and chlamydial infection in rural Tanzanian men.

Authors:  H Grosskurth; P Mayaud; F Mosha; J Todd; K Senkoro; J Newell; R Gabone; J Changalucha; B West; R Hayes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.