Literature DB >> 10178647

Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescents and adults. Clinical and economic implications.

C A Marra1, D M Patrick, R Reynolds, F Marra.   

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, screening and pharmacotherapy of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in adolescents and adults, together with a critical review of economic studies published on this topic. C. trachomatis continues to produce enormous social and economic consequences despite advances in prevention, screening and treatment. Both infected men and women are at risk of developing sequelae, although women tend to have more serious complications. Several strategies are available for diagnosis and screening. In populations with a high prevalence of disease, DNA-amplification assays may be the most cost-effective approach for diagnosis and screening. Empirical treatment of all patients is also cost effective; however, it may not be feasible for all health systems. A single dose of azithromycin is the most cost-effective antimicrobial agent for treatment of C. trachomatis infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10178647     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199813020-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  98 in total

1.  Efficiency and cost-effectiveness of field follow-up for patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic.

Authors:  B P Katz; C S Danos; T S Quinn; V Caine; R B Jones
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1988 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Cost-effectiveness of culturing for Chlamydia trachomatis. A study in a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  M D Nettleman; R B Jones; S D Roberts; B P Katz; A E Washington; R S Dittus; T S Quinn
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Azithromycin in the treatment of sexually transmitted disease.

Authors:  O Steingrimsson; J H Olafsson; H Thorarinsson; R W Ryan; R B Johnson; R C Tilton
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Predictors of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women in general practice.

Authors:  F Bro; S Juul
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Azithromycin vs doxycycline in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  J D Whatley; R N Thin; G Mumtaz; G L Ridgway
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.359

6.  Selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a primary care population of women.

Authors:  A Stergachis; D Scholes; F E Heidrich; D M Sherer; K K Holmes; W E Stamm
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Cost-effectiveness of screening women at moderate risk for genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  M D Nettleman; R B Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The role of chlamydiae in epididymitis.

Authors:  M D Melekos; H W Asbach
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Cost of and payment source for pelvic inflammatory disease. Trends and projections, 1983 through 2000.

Authors:  A E Washington; P Katz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results.

Authors:  L Weström; R Joesoef; G Reynolds; A Hagdu; S E Thompson
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  3 in total

1.  Chlamydia screening in primary care.

Authors:  Pippa Oakeshott; Phillip Hay; Mark Pakianathan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.

Authors:  J M Miller; D H Martin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to azithromycin.

Authors:  Moumita Sarkar; Cindy Woodland; Gideon Koren; Adrienne R N Einarson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.