Literature DB >> 15893425

Identifying visual-vestibular contributions during target-directed locomotion.

Anthony N Carlsen1, Paul M Kennedy, Ken G Anderson, Erin K Cressman, Paul Nagelkerke, Romeo Chua.   

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the potential interaction between visual and vestibular inputs as participants walked towards 1 of 3 targets located on a barrier 5m away. Visual and vestibular inputs were perturbed with displacing prisms and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), respectively. For each target there were three vision conditions (no prisms, prisms left, and prisms right), and three GVS conditions (no GVS, anode left, and anode right). Participants were instructed to start with eyes closed, and to open the eyes at heel contact of the first step. GVS and target illumination were triggered by the first heel contact. This ensured that the upcoming visual condition and target were unknown and that both sensory perturbations occurred simultaneously. Lateral displacement was determined every 40 cm. Irrespective of target or direction, GVS or prism perturbation alone resulted in similar lateral deviations. When combined, the GVS and prism perturbations that had similar singular effects led to significantly larger deviations in the direction of the perturbations. The deviations were approximately equal to the sum of the single deviations indicating that the combined effects were additive. Conflicting GVS and prism perturbations led to significantly smaller deviations that were close to zero, indicating that opposite perturbations cancelled each other. These results show that when both visual and vestibular information remain important during task performance, the nervous system integrates the inputs equally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15893425     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.04.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  5 in total

1.  Changing lanes: inertial cues and explicit path information facilitate steering performance when visual feedback is removed.

Authors:  Kristen L Macuga; Andrew C Beall; Jonathan W Kelly; Roy S Smith; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bracing of the trunk and neck has a differential effect on head control during gait.

Authors:  S Morrison; D M Russell; K Kelleran; M L Walker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Modeling locomotor dysfunction following spaceflight with Galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Steven T Moore; Hamish G MacDougall; Brian T Peters; Jacob J Bloomberg; Ian S Curthoys; Helen S Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual-vestibular influences on locomotor adjustments for stepping over an obstacle.

Authors:  Bradford J McFadyen; Laurent Bouyer; Leah R Bent; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Gait in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.

Authors:  Yong-Hyun Lim; Kyunghun Kang; Ho-Won Lee; Ji-Soo Kim; Sung-Hee Kim
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.