Literature DB >> 14600796

Visuo-vestibular interaction in the reconstruction of travelled trajectories.

R J V Bertin1, A Berthoz.   

Abstract

We recently published a study of the reconstruction of passively travelled trajectories from optic flow. Perception was prone to illusions in a number of conditions, and was not always veridical in the others. Part of the illusionary reconstructed trajectories could be explained by assuming that subjects base their reconstruction on the ego-motion percept built during the stimulus' initial moments. In the current paper, we test this hypothesis using a novel paradigm: if the final reconstruction is governed by the initial percept, providing additional, extra-retinal information that modifies the initial percept should predictably alter the final reconstruction. The extra-retinal stimulus was tuned to supplement the information that was under-represented or ambiguous in the optic flow; the subjects were physically displaced or rotated at the onset of the visual stimulus. A highly asymmetric velocity profile (high acceleration, very low deceleration) was used. Subjects were required to guide an input device (in the form of a model vehicle; we measured position and orientation) along the perceived trajectory. We show for the first time that a vestibular stimulus of short duration can influence the perception of a much longer-lasting visual stimulus. Perception of the ego-motion translation component in the visual stimulus was improved by a linear physical displacement, perception of the ego-motion rotation component by a physical rotation. This led to a more veridical reconstruction in some conditions, but to a less veridical reconstruction in other conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14600796     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1524-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Why you should look where you are going.

Authors:  J P Wann; D K Swapp
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Estimation of self-turning in the dark: comparison between active and passive rotation.

Authors:  R Jürgens; T Boss; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex.

Authors:  T Brandt; P Bartenstein; A Janek; M Dieterich
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Visually perceiving heading on circular and elliptical paths.

Authors:  N G Kim; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Perception of direction of visual motion. II. Influence of linear body acceleration.

Authors:  T Probst; R Loose; S K King; J R Stott; E R Wist; R Wright
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Linear acceleration modifies the perceived velocity of a moving visual scene.

Authors:  B Pavard; A Berthoz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Humans can use optic flow to estimate distance of travel.

Authors:  F P Redlick; M Jenkin; L R Harris
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Estimating heading during eye movements.

Authors:  C S Royden; J A Crowell; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Visual contributions to human self-motion perception during horizontal body rotation.

Authors:  T Mergner; G Schweigart; M Müller; F Hlavacka; W Becker
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.000

View more
  20 in total

1.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual and nonvisual contributions to three-dimensional heading selectivity in the medial superior temporal area.

Authors:  Yong Gu; Paul V Watkins; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatial reference frames of visual, vestibular, and multimodal heading signals in the dorsal subdivision of the medial superior temporal area.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Sentao Wang; Yong Gu; Gregory C Deangelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Changing lanes: inertial cues and explicit path information facilitate steering performance when visual feedback is removed.

Authors:  Kristen L Macuga; Andrew C Beall; Jonathan W Kelly; Roy S Smith; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Constructive perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Gin McCollum
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Amanda H Turner; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Storing upright turns: how visual and vestibular cues interact during the encoding and recalling process.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Multimodal coding of three-dimensional rotation and translation in area MSTd: comparison of visual and vestibular selectivity.

Authors:  Katsumasa Takahashi; Yong Gu; Paul J May; Shawn D Newlands; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; Joshua H Siegle; Betty J Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Knots: attractive places with high path tortuosity in mouse open field exploration.

Authors:  Anna Dvorkin; Henry Szechtman; Ilan Golani
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.