| Literature DB >> 21279159 |
Michael Davison1, Douglas Elliffe.
Abstract
Four pigeons were trained on a conditional discrimination. The conditional stimuli were compounds of pairs of stimuli from two different dimensions, fast versus slow cycles of red or green stimuli, and short- versus long-duration presentations of these cycles. Across conditions, the probability of reinforcers for correctly responding to each dimension was varied from 0 to 1. Discriminability, measured by log d, for stimuli on a dimension increased as the relative frequency of reinforcers for that dimension increased, replicating the results of Shahan and Podlesnik (2006). Two further conditions showed that discriminability between stimuli on each dimension was unaffected by whether the stimuli on the other dimension varied or were constant. Finally, maximal discriminability was unchanged in a redundant-relevant cues condition in which either of the stimuli comprising a compound signaled the same correct response. Davison and Nevin's (1999) model provided an excellent quantitative account of the effect of relative reinforcer frequency on discriminability, and thus of the way in which divided stimulus control is itself controlled by relative reinforcement.Keywords: compound stimuli; conditional discrimination; key peck; pigeons; relative reinforcers; stimulus control
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21279159 PMCID: PMC2893614 DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Anal Behav ISSN: 0022-5002 Impact factor: 2.468