Literature DB >> 21279159

Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.

Michael Davison1, Douglas Elliffe.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were trained on a conditional discrimination. The conditional stimuli were compounds of pairs of stimuli from two different dimensions, fast versus slow cycles of red or green stimuli, and short- versus long-duration presentations of these cycles. Across conditions, the probability of reinforcers for correctly responding to each dimension was varied from 0 to 1. Discriminability, measured by log d, for stimuli on a dimension increased as the relative frequency of reinforcers for that dimension increased, replicating the results of Shahan and Podlesnik (2006). Two further conditions showed that discriminability between stimuli on each dimension was unaffected by whether the stimuli on the other dimension varied or were constant. Finally, maximal discriminability was unchanged in a redundant-relevant cues condition in which either of the stimuli comprising a compound signaled the same correct response. Davison and Nevin's (1999) model provided an excellent quantitative account of the effect of relative reinforcer frequency on discriminability, and thus of the way in which divided stimulus control is itself controlled by relative reinforcement.

Keywords:  compound stimuli; conditional discrimination; key peck; pigeons; relative reinforcers; stimulus control

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21279159      PMCID: PMC2893614          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Attention in the pigeon.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reinforcement for errors in a signal-detection procedure.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Attention in the pigeon: a reevaluation.

Authors:  D M Wilkie; M E Masson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Divided attention performance and the matching law.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reinforcement contingencies and signal detection.

Authors:  J A Nevin; P Jenkins; S Whittaker; P Yarensky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Unraveling sources of stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task.

Authors:  Carlos Pinto; Armando Machado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.

Authors:  Stephanie Gomes-Ng; Douglas Elliffe; Sarah Cowie
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Differential reinforcement and resistance to change of divided-attention performance.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Eric Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.